Department of Pathology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Undergraduate Students Section, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Oct 1;19(7):1697-1713. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_188_22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Tumor budding is gaining importance as a prognostic factor in various carcinomas due to its association with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and hence clinical outcome. Reporting tumor budding in breast cancer lacks homogeneity. We aim to systematically review the existing literature and conduct a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic implication of tumor budding in breast carcinoma. A systematic search was performed to identify studies that compared different prognostic variables between high- and low-grade tumor budding. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Dichotomous variables were pooled using the odds ratio using the Der-Simonian-Laird method. Meta-analysis was conducted to study the association between low/high-grade tumor budding and tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, ER, PR, HER2neu, KI67, and the molecular subtype triple-negative breast carcinoma. Thirteen studies with a total of 1763 patients were included. A moderate risk of bias was noted. The median bias scoring was 7 (6-9). High-grade tumor budding was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.52-3.34, P < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion (OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.10-4.71, P < 0.01), and low-grade budding was significantly associated with triple-negative breast carcinoma (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.95, P = 0.03)There was significant heterogeneity in the assessment and grading of tumor budding; thus, a checklist of items was identified that lacked standardization. Our meta-analysis concluded that tumor budding can act as an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer.
肿瘤芽殖作为一种与上皮-间质转化(EMT)相关的预后因素,在各种癌症中越来越受到重视,因此与临床结果相关。在乳腺癌中报告肿瘤芽殖缺乏一致性。我们旨在系统地回顾现有文献,并进行荟萃分析,以评估乳腺癌中肿瘤芽殖的预后意义。进行了系统搜索,以确定比较高和低级别肿瘤芽殖之间不同预后变量的研究。使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。使用德西蒙尼-莱尔德方法使用优势比汇总二项式变量。进行荟萃分析以研究低/高级别肿瘤芽殖与肿瘤分级、淋巴结转移、淋巴管浸润、ER、PR、HER2neu、KI67 和三阴性乳腺癌的分子亚型之间的关联。纳入了 13 项共 1763 名患者的研究。注意到中等偏倚风险。中位偏倚评分 7(6-9)。高级别肿瘤芽殖与淋巴结转移(OR:2.25,95%CI:1.52-3.34,P < 0.01)和淋巴管浸润(OR:3.14,95%CI:2.10-4.71,P < 0.01)显著相关,而低级别芽殖与三阴性乳腺癌显著相关(OR:0.61,95%CI:0.39-0.95,P = 0.03)。肿瘤芽殖的评估和分级存在显著异质性;因此,确定了一个缺乏标准化的项目清单。我们的荟萃分析得出结论,肿瘤芽殖可以作为乳腺癌的独立预后标志物。