Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands ; and.
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 May 1;38(5):240-246. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002782.
To evaluate the current standard of care regarding empirical antimicrobial therapy in fracture-related infections (FRIs).
Retrospective cohort study.
Level I Trauma Center.
Adult patients treated for FRI with surgical debridement and empirical antibiotics between September 1, 2014, and August 31, 2022. Patients were excluded if less than 5 tissue samples for culture were taken, culture results were negative, or there was an antibiotic-free window of less than 3 days before debridement.
FRI microbial etiology, antimicrobial resistance patterns (standardized antimicrobial panels were tested for each pathogen), the mismatch rate between empirical antimicrobial therapy and antibiotic resistance of causative microorganism(s), and mismatching risk factors.
In total, 75 patients were included [79% (59/75) men, mean age 51 years]. The most prevalent microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (52%, 39/75) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (41%, 31/75). The most frequently used empirical antibiotic was clindamycin (59%, 44/75), followed by combinations of gram-positive and gram-negative covering antibiotics (15%, 11/75). The overall mismatch rate was 51% (38/75) [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.62] and did not differ between extremities [upper: 31% (4/13) (95% CI, 0.09-0.61), lower: 55% (33/60) (95% CI, 0.42-0.68, P = 0.11)]. Mismatching empirical therapy occurred mostly in infections caused by S. epidermidis and gram-negative bacteria. Combination therapy of vancomycin with ceftazidime produced the lowest theoretical mismatch rate (8%, 6/71). Polymicrobial infections were an independent risk factor for mismatching (OR: 8.38, 95% CI, 2.53-27.75, P < 0.001).
In patients with FRI, a mismatching of empirical antibiotic therapy occurred in half of patients, mainly due to lack of coverage for S. epidermidis , gram-negative bacteria, and polymicrobial infections. Empirical therapy with vancomycin and ceftazidime produced the lowest theoretical mismatch rates. This study showed the need for the consideration of gram-negative coverage in addition to standard broad gram-positive coverage. Future studies should investigate the effect of the proposed empirical therapy on long-term outcomes.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
评估骨折相关感染(FRI)中经验性抗菌治疗的当前标准护理。
回顾性队列研究。
一级创伤中心。
2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间接受 FRI 手术清创和经验性抗生素治疗的成年患者。如果采集的组织样本少于 5 个用于培养、培养结果为阴性或在清创前抗生素无药期少于 3 天,则排除患者。
FRI 微生物病因、抗菌药物耐药模式(针对每个病原体测试了标准化抗菌药物组合)、经验性抗菌治疗与致病微生物(s)耐药性之间的不匹配率以及不匹配的危险因素。
共纳入 75 例患者[79%(59/75)为男性,平均年龄 51 岁]。最常见的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(52%,39/75)和表皮葡萄球菌(41%,31/75)。最常使用的经验性抗生素是克林霉素(59%,44/75),其次是革兰阳性和革兰阴性覆盖抗生素的组合(15%,11/75)。总体不匹配率为 51%(38/75)[95%置信区间(CI),0.39-0.62],四肢之间无差异[上肢:31%(4/13)(95%CI,0.09-0.61),下肢:55%(33/60)(95%CI,0.42-0.68,P=0.11)]。不匹配的经验性治疗主要发生在表皮葡萄球菌和革兰氏阴性细菌引起的感染中。万古霉素联合头孢他啶治疗产生的理论不匹配率最低(8%,6/71)。混合感染是不匹配的独立危险因素(OR:8.38,95%CI,2.53-27.75,P<0.001)。
在 FRI 患者中,有一半患者的经验性抗生素治疗不匹配,主要是由于缺乏对表皮葡萄球菌、革兰氏阴性菌和混合感染的覆盖。万古霉素和头孢他啶的经验性治疗产生的理论不匹配率最低。本研究表明,除了标准的广泛革兰氏阳性覆盖外,还需要考虑革兰氏阴性覆盖。未来的研究应调查所提出的经验性治疗对长期结果的影响。
预后 III 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。