Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), Medical School, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
General Surgery, Hospital Braga, Portugal.
Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;53:102046. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102046. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the most important factor to decide the need of adjuvant chemotherapy is the histological lymph node (LN) evaluation. Our work aimed to give a broad view over the use of methylene blue and its consequences in the number of lymph node harvest.
PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE and EMBASE databases were consulted, retrieving clinical trials, which mentioned the used of intra-arterial methylene blue in patients with colorectal cancer.
Eighteen clinical trials analyzing the use of intra-arterial methylene blue in specimens of colorectal cancer were selected. The articles show a statistical difference between the use of methylene blue and the classical dissection in both variable at study. The results of the statistical analysis of the lymph node harvest variable demonstrate a significant statistical difference between the group that received methylene blue injection and the group that underwent conventional dissection. There is a significant statistical difference between the experimental and control groups for the ideal lymph node harvest (lymph node harvest count greater than 12).
The use of intra-arterial methylene blue revealed a high potential for the quantification of lymph nodes, considering the increase of lymph node harvest and the higher percentage of cases with more than 12 lymph nodes count, albeit the high heterogeneity between the studies in terms of reported results. Future investigations with controlled double blinded studies obtaining better categorized results should be conducted in order to better evaluate this technique and compare it to the current paradigm.
在结直肠癌(CRC)患者中,决定是否需要辅助化疗的最重要因素是组织学淋巴结(LN)评估。我们的工作旨在广泛了解亚甲蓝的使用及其对淋巴结收获数量的影响。
检索了 PUBMED、WEB OF SCIENCE 和 EMBASE 数据库中提到在结直肠癌患者中使用动脉内亚甲蓝的临床试验。
选择了 18 项分析动脉内亚甲蓝在结直肠癌标本中使用的临床试验。这些文章显示,在研究变量方面,亚甲蓝的使用与经典解剖之间存在统计学差异。对淋巴结收获变量的统计分析结果表明,接受亚甲蓝注射组与常规解剖组之间存在显著的统计学差异。实验组和对照组之间在理想的淋巴结收获(淋巴结收获计数大于 12)方面存在显著的统计学差异。
动脉内亚甲蓝的使用显示出在定量淋巴结方面具有很高的潜力,考虑到淋巴结收获的增加以及超过 12 个淋巴结计数的病例比例更高,尽管在报告结果方面,研究之间存在高度异质性。应进行具有对照双盲研究的未来研究,以获得更好分类的结果,以便更好地评估该技术并将其与当前的范例进行比较。