Harada T, Noto H, Etori K, Kumasaki T, Kigure T, Nishizawa O, Tsuchida S
Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai Zasshi. 1985 Dec;21(6):455-66. doi: 10.1540/jsmr1965.21.455.
A new examination (bolusmetry) to evaluate the urine transport function of the ureteropelvic system was performed in 7 adult patients with congenital unilateral hydronephrosis. Whistle-tipped Fr. 5 catheters were introduced to each ureter about 5 cm proximal from the ureteral orifice by transurethral endoscopic technique. Bolus volume and frequency, and changes in them caused by furosemide injection, were estimated by using a drop counter which was connected to the terminal end of the ureteral catheter. Bolusmetry was performed comparing the hydronephrotic side and the healthy side, pre and postoperatively, and these results were then compared with a conventional examination. We obtained the following results: Bolus volume of the hydronephrotic side was 0.05 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- S.D.) ml at oliguric state, and it was significantly lower than the value of the healthy side which was 0.19 +/- 0.07 ml. Injection of diuretics increased the bolus volume of the healthy side ten times or more. On the other hand, the bolus volume of the hydronephrotic side was increased only slightly by the injection of furosemide, it being approximately one-fourth of the value of the healthy side. The value of bolus frequency was similar to peristaltic frequency which was measured by the electromyogram. The tendency of a decrease was noticed in bolus frequency of the hydronephrotic side but it was not significant. Of patients with severe hydronephrosis, the bolus volume of the hydronephrotic side was decreased and the response to the diuretics was not so significant. By bolusmetry, functional or organic obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction was detected. Of 3 patients who had nephrectomy or nephrostomy, the kidney function had deteriorated severely. The bolus volume was lower than 0.25 ml at the diuretic state. Bolus volume was increased postoperatively in 3 of 4 patients who had received pelvioplasty. One patient did not show the formation of bolus by the injection of diuretics, and the cause of the hydronephrosis was functional obstruction of the pelvioureteric junction. We concluded that bolusmetry is a valuable method for evaluation of the function of urine transport in the ureteropelvic system. Especially in hydronephrosis, bolusmetry is a useful in the choice of operative procedure, and for postoperative evaluation.
对7例先天性单侧肾积水成年患者进行了一项评估输尿管肾盂系统尿液输送功能的新检查(团注测定法)。采用经尿道内镜技术,将Fr.5哨尖导管插入距输尿管口约5 cm的每条输尿管近端。通过连接到输尿管导管末端的滴数计数器来估计团注量和频率,以及呋塞米注射引起的它们的变化。在肾积水侧和健康侧,术前和术后进行团注测定法检查,然后将这些结果与传统检查进行比较。我们得到了以下结果:在少尿状态下,肾积水侧的团注量为0.05±0.02(平均值±标准差)ml,显著低于健康侧的0.19±0.07 ml。注射利尿剂使健康侧的团注量增加了10倍或更多。另一方面,肾积水侧的团注量仅因注射呋塞米而略有增加,约为健康侧值的四分之一。团注频率值与通过肌电图测量的蠕动频率相似。肾积水侧的团注频率有下降趋势,但不显著。在重度肾积水患者中,肾积水侧的团注量减少,对利尿剂的反应不显著。通过团注测定法,检测到输尿管肾盂连接部的功能性或器质性梗阻。在3例行肾切除术或肾造瘘术的患者中,肾功能严重恶化。在利尿状态下,团注量低于0.25 ml。在4例行肾盂成形术的患者中,3例术后团注量增加。1例患者注射利尿剂后未出现团注形成,肾积水的原因是肾盂输尿管连接部的功能性梗阻。我们得出结论,团注测定法是评估输尿管肾盂系统尿液输送功能的一种有价值的方法。特别是在肾积水方面,团注测定法有助于选择手术方式和进行术后评估。