Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;132(4):707-724. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
Chronic pain is a severely debilitating condition with enormous socioeconomic costs. Current treatment regimens with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), steroids, or opioids have been largely unsatisfactory with uncertain benefits or severe long-term side effects. This is mainly because chronic pain has a multifactorial aetiology. Although conventional pain medications can alleviate pain by keeping several dysfunctional pathways under control, they can mask other underlying pathological causes, ultimately worsening nerve pathologies and pain outcome. Recent preclinical studies have shown that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress could be a central hub for triggering multiple molecular cascades involved in the development of chronic pain. Several ER stress inhibitors and unfolded protein response modulators, which have been tested in randomised clinical trials or apprpoved by the US Food and Drug Administration for other chronic diseases, significantly alleviated hyperalgesia in multiple preclinical pain models. Although the role of ER stress in neurodegenerative disorders, metabolic disorders, and cancer has been well established, research on ER stress and chronic pain is still in its infancy. Here, we critically analyse preclinical studies and explore how ER stress can mechanistically act as a central node to drive development and progression of chronic pain. We also discuss therapeutic prospects, benefits, and pitfalls of using ER stress inhibitors and unfolded protein response modulators for managing intractable chronic pain. In the future, targeting ER stress to impact multiple molecular networks might be an attractive therapeutic strategy against chronic pain refractory to steroids, NSAIDs, or opioids. This novel therapeutic strategy could provide solutions for the opioid crisis and public health challenge.
慢性疼痛是一种严重的致残性疾病,会带来巨大的社会经济成本。目前使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、类固醇或阿片类药物的治疗方案效果并不理想,疗效不确定且存在严重的长期副作用。这主要是因为慢性疼痛的病因具有多因素性。虽然传统的止痛药物可以通过控制几种功能失调的途径来缓解疼痛,但它们可能会掩盖其他潜在的病理原因,最终导致神经病变和疼痛恶化。最近的临床前研究表明,内质网(ER)应激可能是触发参与慢性疼痛发展的多个分子级联反应的中心枢纽。几种 ER 应激抑制剂和未折叠蛋白反应调节剂已在随机临床试验中进行了测试,或被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗其他慢性疾病,它们在多种临床前疼痛模型中显著缓解了痛觉过敏。尽管 ER 应激在神经退行性疾病、代谢紊乱和癌症中的作用已得到充分证实,但 ER 应激与慢性疼痛之间的研究仍处于起步阶段。在这里,我们批判性地分析了临床前研究,并探讨了 ER 应激如何作为一个中心节点,在机制上驱动慢性疼痛的发展和进展。我们还讨论了使用 ER 应激抑制剂和未折叠蛋白反应调节剂治疗难治性慢性疼痛的治疗前景、益处和陷阱。未来,针对 ER 应激以影响多个分子网络可能是一种有吸引力的治疗策略,可用于治疗对类固醇、NSAIDs 或阿片类药物耐药的慢性疼痛。这种新的治疗策略可能为阿片类药物危机和公共卫生挑战提供解决方案。