Laboratorio de Antropología, Dpto de Medicina Legal, Toxicología y Antropología Física, Universidad de Granada, Avda. de la Investigación, 11, 18006, Granada, Spain.
Dpto. de Nutrición y Bromatología, Toxicología y Medicina Legal. Área de Medicina Legal y Forense, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Dr. Fedriani, S/N, 41009, Seville, Spain.
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Jul;138(4):1701-1712. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03192-5. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
Age estimation methods through the metric study of bones in non-adult individuals are a frequently used tool in Biological and Forensic Anthropology; however, few methodological validation studies are available, given the limited number of adequate samples for their study. In this context, the aim of this work is to test the effectiveness of the methods of Fazekas and Kósa (1978), Saunders et al. (1993), Rissech and Black (2007) and Cardoso et al. (2017), for age estimation through the measurements of the scapula, in the non-adult osteological collection of the Anthropology Laboratory of the University of Granada (Spain), one of the most representative identified non-adult collections internationally. For this purpose, nine different measurements of the scapula were taken from a total of 149 non-adult individuals, applying the regression formulae proposed by the different authors and verifying their accuracy. Results have shown the existence of significant differences between the real age and the estimated age in almost all the tested methods, with degrees of error that differ from those obtained in the original study populations. Based on the obtained results, it is recommended to use the method of Cardoso et al. in postnatal individuals, always adjusting the degrees of error with those obtained in this work.
通过对非成年人骨骼的度量研究来进行年龄估计的方法是生物和法医人类学中常用的工具;然而,由于用于研究的合适样本数量有限,因此很少有方法验证研究。在这种情况下,这项工作的目的是测试 Fazekas 和 Kósa(1978)、Saunders 等人(1993)、Rissech 和 Black(2007)以及 Cardoso 等人(2017)方法的有效性,这些方法通过测量肩胛骨来进行年龄估计,使用的是西班牙格拉纳达大学人类学实验室(西班牙)的非成年人骨骼收藏中的肩胛骨,这是国际上最具代表性的非成年人收藏之一。为此,从总共 149 名非成年人中对肩胛骨进行了九项不同的测量,应用了不同作者提出的回归公式,并验证了它们的准确性。结果表明,几乎所有测试方法中,实际年龄与估计年龄之间存在显著差异,误差程度与原始研究人群中获得的结果不同。根据获得的结果,建议在产后个体中使用 Cardoso 等人的方法,并始终使用在这项工作中获得的误差程度进行调整。