Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2148-2159. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02471-x. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
People vary in their ability to recognize objects visually. Individual differences for matching and recognizing objects visually is supported by a domain-general ability capturing common variance across different tasks (e.g., Richler et al., Psychological Review, 126, 226-251, 2019). Behavioral (e.g., Cooke et al., Neuropsychologia, 45, 484-495, 2007) and neural evidence (e.g., Amedi, Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1202-1212, 2002) suggest overlapping mechanisms in the processing of visual and haptic information in the service of object recognition, but it is unclear whether such group-average results generalize to individual differences. Psychometrically validated measures are required, which have been lacking in the haptic modality. We investigate whether object recognition ability is specific to vision or extends to haptics using psychometric measures we have developed. We use multiple visual and haptic tests with different objects and different formats to measure domain-general visual and haptic abilities and to test for relations across them. We measured object recognition abilities using two visual tests and four haptic tests (two each for two kinds of haptic exploration) in 97 participants. Partial correlation and confirmatory factor analyses converge to support the existence of a domain-general haptic object recognition ability that is moderately correlated with domain-general visual object recognition ability. Visual and haptic abilities share about 25% of their variance, supporting the existence of a multisensory domain-general ability while leaving a substantial amount of residual variance for modality-specific abilities. These results extend our understanding of the structure of object recognition abilities; while there are mechanisms that may generalize across categories, tasks, and modalities, there are still other mechanisms that are distinct between modalities.
人们在视觉识别物体的能力上存在差异。个体在视觉上匹配和识别物体的差异是由一种捕捉不同任务中共同方差的领域一般性能力支持的(例如,Richler 等人,《心理学评论》,126,226-251,2019)。行为证据(例如,Cooke 等人,《神经心理学》,45,484-495,2007)和神经证据(例如,Amedi,《大脑皮质》,12,1202-1212,2002)表明,在为物体识别服务的过程中,视觉和触觉信息的处理存在重叠的机制,但不清楚这些群体平均结果是否适用于个体差异。需要使用经过心理测量验证的测量方法,但在触觉模态中一直缺乏这种方法。我们使用我们开发的心理测量方法来研究物体识别能力是否仅限于视觉,或者是否扩展到触觉。我们使用多种不同物体和不同格式的视觉和触觉测试来衡量领域一般性的视觉和触觉能力,并测试它们之间的关系。我们在 97 名参与者中使用两种视觉测试和四种触觉测试(每种触觉探索各两种)来测量物体识别能力。偏相关和验证性因子分析的结果一致支持存在一种领域一般性的触觉物体识别能力,它与领域一般性的视觉物体识别能力中度相关。视觉和触觉能力共享约 25%的方差,支持存在一种多感觉领域一般性能力,同时为模态特异性能力留下大量剩余方差。这些结果扩展了我们对物体识别能力结构的理解;虽然可能存在跨类别、任务和模态的泛化机制,但仍然存在模态之间独特的其他机制。