• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别新事物和熟悉事物的能力是相同的。

Novel and familiar object recognition rely on the same ability.

作者信息

Sunday Mackenzie A, Tomarken Andrew, Cho Sun-Joo, Gauthier Isabel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Mar;151(3):676-694. doi: 10.1037/xge0001100. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001100
PMID:34582233
Abstract

There is recent evidence for a domain-general object recognition ability, called O, which is distinct from general intelligence and other cognitive and personality constructs. We extend the study of O by characterizing how it generalizes to the ability to recognize familiar objects and to the ability to make judgments of the average identity of ensembles of objects. We applied latent variable modeling to data collected from a sample of adults (N = 284) in three different tasks and for six different object domains (three novel and three familiar). The results replicated prior work in finding that on average 88% of the variance of lower-order factors could be accounted by O for novel objects. The latent constructs recruited by the higher-order factor for novel objects and for familiar objects were almost perfectly correlated and therefore functionally identical. A latent factor for ensemble perception shared about 42% of the variance with O, suggesting at least strong overlap between abilities supporting judgments about individual objects and ensemble of objects. This work extends the theoretical reach of O by showing generalization across two dimensions (familiar vs. novel objects; individual vs. ensemble object perception). With respect to the structure of individual differences in high-level vision, researchers would benefit from accounting for the contribution of O when seeking to understand various domain-specific abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

最近有证据表明存在一种领域通用的物体识别能力,称为O,它与一般智力以及其他认知和人格结构不同。我们通过描述O如何推广到识别熟悉物体的能力以及对物体集合的平均身份进行判断的能力,来扩展对O的研究。我们将潜在变量建模应用于从284名成年人样本中收集的数据,这些数据来自三项不同任务以及六个不同的物体领域(三个新领域和三个熟悉领域)。结果重复了之前的研究,发现对于新物体,平均88%的低阶因素方差可由O解释。新物体和熟悉物体的高阶因素所招募的潜在结构几乎完全相关,因此在功能上是相同的。集合感知的一个潜在因素与O共享约42%的方差,这表明支持对单个物体和物体集合进行判断的能力之间至少有很强的重叠。这项工作通过展示在两个维度上的推广(熟悉物体与新物体;个体物体感知与集合物体感知),扩展了O的理论范围。关于高级视觉中个体差异的结构,研究人员在试图理解各种领域特定能力时,考虑O的贡献将受益匪浅。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Novel and familiar object recognition rely on the same ability.识别新事物和熟悉事物的能力是相同的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Mar;151(3):676-694. doi: 10.1037/xge0001100. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Individual differences in object recognition.个体在物体识别方面的差异。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):226-251. doi: 10.1037/rev0000129.
3
Domain-general ability underlies complex object ensemble processing.领域一般性能力是复杂物体整体加工的基础。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Apr;151(4):966-972. doi: 10.1037/xge0001110. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
A general ability for judging simple and complex ensembles.判断简单和复杂集合的一般能力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jun;153(6):1517-1536. doi: 10.1037/xge0001582.
5
The role of category- and exemplar-specific experience in ensemble processing of objects.类别和范例特异性经验在物体整体加工中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1080-1093. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02162-4. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
One-shot object parsing in newborn chicks.新生雏鸡的一次性目标解析
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Nov;150(11):2408-2420. doi: 10.1037/xge0001043. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
General object recognition is specific: Evidence from novel and familiar objects.一般物体识别具有特异性:来自新物体和熟悉物体的证据。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 26.
8
How general is ensemble perception?整体感知有多普遍?
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):695-708. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01883-z. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Distinct but related abilities for visual and haptic object recognition.视觉和触觉物体识别的不同但相关的能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2148-2159. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02471-x. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Domain-specific experience determines individual differences in holistic processing.领域特定经验决定整体加工的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):31-41. doi: 10.1037/xge0000628. Epub 2019 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring visual ability in linguistically diverse populations.在语言多样化人群中测量视觉能力。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):36. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02579-x.
2
Measuring object recognition ability: Reliability, validity, and the aggregate z-score approach.测量物体识别能力:可靠性、有效性和综合 z 分数方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):6598-6612. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02372-w. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Distinct but related abilities for visual and haptic object recognition.视觉和触觉物体识别的不同但相关的能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2148-2159. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02471-x. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
4
Object recognition ability predicts category learning with medical images.物体识别能力预测医学图像的类别学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 1;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00456-9.
5
The Relation between Ensemble Coding of Length and Orientation Does Not Depend on Spatial Attention.长度与方向的整体编码之间的关系并不依赖于空间注意力。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Dec 28;7(1):3. doi: 10.3390/vision7010003.
6
The neural correlates of domain-general visual ability.域泛化视觉能力的神经关联。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 4;33(8):4280-4292. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac342.
7
Visual object recognition ability is not related to experience with visual arts.视觉物体识别能力与视觉艺术经验无关。
J Vis. 2022 Jun 1;22(7):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.1.
8
Haptic object recognition based on shape relates to visual object recognition ability.基于形状的触觉物体识别与视觉物体识别能力有关。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1262-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01560-z. Epub 2021 Aug 5.