Mulligan Megan K, Hamre Kristin M
Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, TN, United States.
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, TN, United States.
Adv Drug Alcohol Res. 2023 Feb 28;3:10981. doi: 10.3389/adar.2023.10981. eCollection 2023.
Public perception surrounding whether cannabis use is harmful during pregnancy often diverges greatly from the recommendations of doctors and healthcare providers. In contrast to the medical guidance of abstinence before, during, and after pregnancy, many women of reproductive age believe cannabis use during pregnancy is associated with little potential harm. Legalization and social cues support public perceptions that cannabis use during pregnancy is safe. Moreover, pregnant women may consider cannabis to be a safe alternative for treating pregnancy related ailments, including morning sickness. Compounding the problem is a lack of medical and federal guidance on safe, low, or high-risk levels of cannabis use. These issues mirror the continuing debate surrounding alcohol use and health, in particular, whether there are safe or lower risk levels of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Clinical studies to date suffer from several limitations. First, most human studies are correlative in nature, meaning that causal associations cannot be made between cannabis exposure and health and behavioral outcomes later in life. Due to obvious ethical constraints, it is not possible to randomly assign pregnant mothers to cannabis or other drug exposure conditions-a requirement needed to establish causality. In addition, clinical studies often lack quantitative information on maternal exposure (i.e., dose, frequency, and duration), include a small number of individuals, lack replication of outcome measures across cohorts, rely on self-report to establish maternal drug use, and suffer from unmeasured or residual confounding factors. Causal associations between maternal cannabis exposure and offspring outcomes are possible in preclinical cohorts but there is a large amount of heterogeneity across study designs and developmental differences between rodents and humans may limit translatability. In this review, we summarize research from human and preclinical models to provide insight into potential risks associated with prenatal cannabinoid exposure (PCE). Finally, we highlight gaps in knowledge likely to contribute to the growing divide between medical guidance and public attitudes regarding cannabis use during pregnancy.
公众对于孕期使用大麻是否有害的认知往往与医生和医疗服务提供者的建议大相径庭。与孕期前后都应戒除大麻的医学指导相反,许多育龄女性认为孕期使用大麻几乎没有潜在危害。大麻合法化以及社会暗示使得公众认为孕期使用大麻是安全的。此外,孕妇可能认为大麻是治疗孕期相关疾病(包括孕吐)的安全替代品。使问题更加复杂的是,目前缺乏关于安全、低风险或高风险大麻使用水平的医学和联邦指导。这些问题反映了围绕饮酒与健康的持续争论,特别是孕期是否存在安全或低风险饮酒水平。迄今为止的临床研究存在若干局限性。首先,大多数人体研究本质上是相关性的,这意味着无法在大麻暴露与日后的健康及行为结果之间建立因果关联。由于明显的伦理限制,不可能将怀孕母亲随机分配到大麻或其他药物暴露组——而这是确定因果关系所必需的条件。此外,临床研究往往缺乏关于母亲暴露的定量信息(即剂量、频率和持续时间),纳入的个体数量较少,缺乏不同队列间结果测量的重复性,依赖自我报告来确定母亲的药物使用情况,并且存在未测量或残留的混杂因素。在临床前队列中,母亲大麻暴露与后代结果之间可能存在因果关联,但不同研究设计存在大量异质性,而且啮齿动物与人类之间的发育差异可能会限制研究结果的可转化性。在本综述中,我们总结了来自人体和临床前模型的研究,以深入了解产前大麻素暴露(PCE)相关的潜在风险。最后,我们强调了知识空白,这些空白可能导致在孕期大麻使用的医学指导与公众态度之间日益扩大的分歧。