Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jan 29;31(2):733-746. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020054.
Whilst existing quantitative research identifies outcomes believed to be important by researchers and clinicians, it may neglect outcomes that are meaningful to patients. This study aimed to explore the outcomes of exercise that are important to people with lung cancer and their carers. Data collection involved a qualitative methodology including semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Question guide development was informed by the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) framework. Data were analyzed by two researchers with NVivo (v12) software using a conventional content analysis process, followed by directed content analysis to map outcomes to the ICF. Conduct and reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines. Fifteen participants provided data. Most participants had received their diagnoses 24 months prior to study involvement ( = 9), and one-third had completed treatment ( = 5). Important outcomes were reported by participants across all domains of the ICF: activity and participation ( = 24), body function ( = 19), body structure ( = 5), environmental factors ( = 5), and personal factors ( = 1). Additional code categories pertained to the impacts of non-cancer factors such as age, frailty, and comorbidities; identifying barriers to exercise; and individualizing outcome measures. Clinicians and researchers should consider selecting outcomes from all relevant domains of the ICF, with a focus on the activity and participation domain, in addition to non-cancer factors such as ageing, frailty, and co-morbidities. Feedback should be provided to patients following outcome measures collection and reassessment.
虽然现有的定量研究确定了研究人员和临床医生认为重要的结果,但它可能忽略了对患者有意义的结果。本研究旨在探讨对肺癌患者及其照顾者重要的运动结果。数据收集涉及定性方法,包括半结构化访谈和焦点小组。问题指南的制定是由国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架提供信息。两名研究人员使用 NVivo(v12)软件对数据进行了分析,使用传统的内容分析过程,然后进行定向内容分析,将结果映射到 ICF。研究遵循 COREQ 指南进行。15 名参与者提供了数据。大多数参与者在参与研究前 24 个月就已经确诊(n=9),三分之一的参与者已经完成了治疗(n=5)。参与者在 ICF 的所有领域都报告了重要的结果:活动和参与(n=24)、身体功能(n=19)、身体结构(n=5)、环境因素(n=5)和个人因素(n=1)。其他代码类别涉及非癌症因素(如年龄、虚弱和合并症)的影响、确定运动障碍的障碍以及个性化结果衡量标准。临床医生和研究人员应考虑从 ICF 的所有相关领域选择结果,除了年龄、虚弱和合并症等非癌症因素外,还应重点关注活动和参与领域。在收集和重新评估结果后,应向患者提供反馈。