Yue Zhen, Zhao Kai, Zhu Shunyu, Hu Yifan
School of Foreign Studies, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.
School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;14(2):126. doi: 10.3390/bs14020126.
We explore whether there are value preferences of creative workers in addition to tolerance and how these value preferences vary among different occupation categories and countries. We use a dataset of 1968 and 1076 observations in China and the U.S., respectively, from the World Values Survey dataset (2017-2020, wave 7) (WVS 7), with a Structure Equation Modelling (SEM) and Multinomial Logit Model (MLM) at the micro level. The findings reveal that (1) the Chinese sample is more likely to have a balanced preference of tolerance towards migrants, religions, and homosexuality, while the American sample's preference of tolerance is much more likely to be interpreted as accepting homosexuality only; (2) the American sample also shows preferences towards responsibility, technology, work style, and political actions, while a preference for happiness and political actions is identified in the Chinese sample; and (3) with a higher level of creativity, the difference regarding understanding of tolerance is more likely to be highlighted between China and the U.S. This study provides a quite unconventional perspective for understanding the composition of preferences and, to a certain extent, reconciles the inconsistency between the theoretical advocacy of building up a selected milieu and the reality of creative workers' blended value mix.
我们探讨了除宽容之外,创意工作者是否存在价值偏好,以及这些价值偏好在不同职业类别和国家之间如何变化。我们分别使用了来自世界价值观调查数据集(2017 - 2020年,第7波)(WVS 7)的中国和美国的数据集,其中中国有1968个观测值,美国有1076个观测值,并在微观层面采用了结构方程模型(SEM)和多项逻辑回归模型(MLM)。研究结果表明:(1)中国样本更倾向于对移民、宗教和同性恋持有平衡的宽容态度,而美国样本的宽容偏好更倾向于仅被解释为接受同性恋;(2)美国样本还表现出对责任、技术、工作方式和政治行动的偏好,而中国样本则表现出对幸福和政治行动的偏好;(3)随着创造力水平的提高,中美两国在对宽容的理解上的差异更有可能凸显出来。本研究为理解偏好的构成提供了一个颇为不同寻常的视角,并在一定程度上协调了构建特定环境的理论倡导与创意工作者混合价值组合现实之间的不一致。