Suppr超能文献

在经股动脉途径无法进行机械取栓时,经桡动脉机械取栓能否作为一种替代方法?单中心经验。

Can Transradial Mechanical Thrombectomy Be an Alternative in Case of Impossible Transfemoral Approach for Mechanical Thrombectomy? A Single Center's Experience.

作者信息

Cho Hyun Wook, Jun Hyo Sub

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Jan;64(1):60-68. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0240. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Until recently, the transfemoral approach (TFA) was used as the primary method of arterial approach in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, TFA resulted in longer reperfusion times and worse outcomes in the mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of patients with complex aortic arches and significant carotid tortuosity. We found that the transradial approach (TRA) is a more favorable alternative approach for MT in such cases.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify 202 patients who underwent MT for AIS between February 2015 and December 2019. Patient characteristics, cause of TFA failure, procedure time, intra-procedural complications, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven (5.4%) of 202 patients, who underwent MT for AIS, crossed over to TRA for recanalization, and eight (72%) of 11 achieved successful recanalization (≥modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction 2b). The mean age (mean±standard deviation [median]) was 82.3±6.6 (76) years, and five of the 11 patients were male. The last seen normal to puncture time was 467.9±264.72 (264) minutes; baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 28.9±14.5 (16). Six (55%) of the 11 patients had right vertebrobasilar occlusions, and the remaining five (45%) had anterior circulation occlusive disease. The time from groin puncture to final recanalization time (overall procedural time) was 78.0±20.1 (62) minutes. The mean crossover time from TFA to TRA was 45.2±10.5 (41) minutes. The mean time from radial puncture to final recanalization was 33.8±10.5 (28) minutes. Distal thrombus migration events in previously unaffected territories occurred in 3/8 patients (37%). At 90 days, three patients (28%) had a favorable clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, failure of TFA has been known to occur during MT for AIS. Our results demonstrate that TRA may be an alternative option for AIS intervention for select patients with subsequent timely revascularization. However, the incidence of distal thrombus migration was high, and the first puncture to reperfusion time was prolonged because of the time taken for the crossover to TRA after failure of TFA. This study provides some evidence that the TRA may be a viable alternative option to the TFA for MT of AIS.

摘要

目的

直到最近,经股动脉入路(TFA)一直是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)动脉入路的主要方法。然而,在复杂主动脉弓和严重颈动脉迂曲的患者进行机械取栓(MT)时,TFA导致再灌注时间延长且预后更差。我们发现,在这种情况下,经桡动脉入路(TRA)是MT更有利的替代入路。

方法

我们对机构数据库进行了回顾性分析,以确定2015年2月至2019年12月期间接受AIS的MT治疗的202例患者。记录患者特征、TFA失败原因、手术时间、术中并发症及预后情况。

结果

202例接受AIS的MT治疗的患者中,有11例(5.4%)转而采用TRA进行再通,其中11例中有8例(72%)成功再通(≥改良脑梗死治疗2b级)。平均年龄(均值±标准差[中位数])为82.3±6.6(76)岁,11例患者中有5例为男性。最后一次正常到穿刺时间为467.9±264.72(264)分钟;基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分为28.9±14.5(16)。11例患者中有6例(55%)为右侧椎基底动脉闭塞,其余5例(45%)为前循环闭塞性疾病。从腹股沟穿刺到最终再通时间(总手术时间)为78.0±20.1(62)分钟。从TFA转为TRA的平均转换时间为45.2±10.5(41)分钟。从桡动脉穿刺到最终再通的平均时间为33.8±10.5(28)分钟。3/8例患者(37%)在先前未受影响的区域发生了远端血栓迁移事件。在90天时,3例患者(28%)获得了良好的临床预后。

结论

尽管罕见,但已知在AIS的MT过程中会发生TFA失败。我们的结果表明,对于部分患者,TRA可能是AIS干预的替代选择,随后可及时进行血管再通。然而,远端血栓迁移的发生率较高,并且由于TFA失败后转换为TRA所需的时间,首次穿刺到再灌注的时间延长。本研究提供了一些证据,表明TRA可能是AIS的MT中TFA的可行替代选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adeb/7819791/416ad5c15fd5/jkns-2020-0240f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验