Suppr超能文献

“我不会给人贴标签,但是……”一项自由列举练习,探究德国两个接待中心的专业人员对寻求庇护者的社会分类。

"I don´t put people into boxes, but…" A free-listing exercise exploring social categorisation of asylum seekers by professionals in two German reception centres.

作者信息

Ziegler Sandra, Bozorgmehr Kayvan

机构信息

Section for Health Equity Studies & Migration, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Population Medicine and Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;4(2):e0002910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002910. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Newly arriving asylum seekers in Germany mostly live in large reception centres, depending on professionals in most aspects of their daily lives. The legal basis for the provision of goods and services allows for discretionary decisions. Given the potential impact of social categorisation on professionals' decisions, and ultimately access to health and social services, we explore the categories used by professionals. We ask of what nature these categorisations are, and weather they align with the public discourse on forced migration. Within an ethnographic study in outpatient clinics of two refugee accommodation centres in Germany, we conducted a modified free-listing with 40 professionals (physicians, nurses, security-personnel, social workers, translators) to explore their categorisation of asylum seekers. Data were qualitatively analysed, and categories were quantitatively mapped using Excel and the Macro "Flame" to show frequencies, ranks, and salience. The four most relevant social categorisations of asylum seekers referred to "demanding and expectant," "polite and friendly" behaviour, "economic refugees," and "integration efforts". In general, sociodemographic variables like gender, age, family status, including countries and regions of origin, were the most significant basis for categorisations (31%), those were often presented combined with other categories. Observations of behaviour and attitudes also influenced categorisations (24%). Professional considerations, e.g., on health, education, adaption or status ranked third (20%). Social categorisation was influenced by public discourses, with evaluations of flight motives, prospects of staying in Germany, and integration potential being thematised in 12% of the categorisations. Professionals therefore might be in danger of being instrumentalised for internal border work. Identifying social categories is important since they structure perception, along their lines deservingness is negotiated, so they potentially influence interaction and decision-making, can trigger empathy and support as well as rejection and discrimination. Larger studies should investigate this further. Free-listing provides a suitable tool for such investigations.

摘要

刚抵达德国的寻求庇护者大多居住在大型接待中心,日常生活的大多数方面都依赖专业人员。提供商品和服务的法律依据允许自行决定。鉴于社会分类对专业人员决策的潜在影响,以及最终对获得健康和社会服务的影响,我们探讨了专业人员使用的分类。我们询问这些分类的性质是什么,以及它们是否与关于被迫移民的公众话语一致。在对德国两个难民收容中心的门诊进行的一项人种学研究中,我们对40名专业人员(医生、护士、安保人员、社会工作者、翻译人员)进行了改良的自由列举,以探讨他们对寻求庇护者的分类。对数据进行了定性分析,并使用Excel和“火焰”宏对分类进行了定量映射,以显示频率、排名和显著性。寻求庇护者最相关的四种社会分类是“苛求且期待”“礼貌且友好”的行为、“经济难民”和“融入努力”。一般来说,社会人口统计学变量,如性别、年龄、家庭状况,包括原籍国和地区,是分类的最重要依据(31%),这些变量经常与其他类别结合呈现。对行为和态度的观察也影响分类(24%)。专业考量,如关于健康、教育、适应或身份的考量,排名第三(20%)。社会分类受到公众话语的影响,在12%的分类中,对逃亡动机、留在德国的前景和融入潜力的评估成为主题。因此,专业人员可能面临被用于内部边境管控的风险。识别社会类别很重要,因为它们构建了认知,沿着这些类别人们会协商应得性,所以它们可能影响互动和决策,能引发同理心、支持以及拒绝和歧视。更大规模的研究应进一步对此进行调查。自由列举为此类调查提供了一个合适的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be6/10889701/83e9761be5f4/pgph.0002910.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验