Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125 004, India.
Veterinary Clinical Complex, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125 004, India.
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Feb 23;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03913-3.
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic disease that results from infection with any member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infected animals are typically diagnosed with tuberculin-based intradermal skin tests according to World Organization of Animal Health which are presently in use. However, tuberculin is not suitable for use in BCG-vaccinated animals due to a high rate of false-positive reactions. Peptide-based defined skin test (DST) antigens have been identified using antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10 and Rv3615c) which are absent from BCG, but their performance in buffaloes remains unknown. To assess the comparative performance of DST with the tuberculin-based single intradermal test (SIT) and the single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT), we screened 543 female buffaloes from 49 organized dairy farms in two districts of Haryana state in India.
We found that 37 (7%), 4 (1%) and 18 (3%) buffaloes were reactors with the SIT, SICCT and DST tests, respectively. Of the 37 SIT reactors, four were positive with SICCT and 12 were positive with the DST. The results show that none of the animals tested positive with all three tests, and 6 DST positive animals were SIT negative. Together, a total of 43 animals were reactors with SIT, DST, or both, and the two assays showed moderate agreement (Cohen's Kappa 0.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.23, 0.59). In contrast, only slight agreement (Cohen's Kappa 0.18; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.34) was observed between SIT and SICCT. Using a Bayesian latent class model, we estimated test specificities of 96.5% (95% CI, 92-99%), 99.7% (95% CI: 98-100%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97-100%) for SIT, SICCT and DST, respectively, but considerably lower sensitivities of 58% (95% CI: 35-87%), 9% (95% CI: 3-21%), and 34% (95% CI: 18-55%) albeit with broad and overlapping credible intervals.
Taken together, our investigation suggests that DST has a test specificity comparable with SICCT, and sensitivity intermediate between SIT and SICCT for the identification of buffaloes suspected of tuberculosis. Our study highlights an urgent need for future well-powered trials with detailed necropsy, with immunological and microbiological profiling of reactor and non-reactor animals to better define the underlying factors for the large observed discrepancies in assay performance, particularly between SIT and SICCT.
牛结核病(bTB)是一种由结核分枝杆菌复合群的任何成员感染引起的慢性疾病。根据世界动物卫生组织(OIE)的规定,目前正在使用结核菌素皮内皮肤试验对感染动物进行诊断。然而,由于存在较高的假阳性反应率,结核菌素不适合用于卡介苗(BCG)接种的动物。基于肽的定义皮肤试验(DST)抗原已使用不存在于 BCG 中的抗原(ESAT-6、CFP-10 和 Rv3615c)进行了鉴定,但它们在水牛中的性能仍不清楚。为了评估 DST 与基于结核菌素的单一皮内试验(SIT)和单一皮内比较颈试验(SICCT)的比较性能,我们对印度哈里亚纳邦两个区的 49 个组织化奶牛场的 543 头雌性水牛进行了筛选。
我们发现,37(7%)、4(1%)和 18(3%)头水牛对 SIT、SICCT 和 DST 试验呈阳性反应。37 例 SIT 阳性反应中,4 例与 SICCT 阳性,12 例与 DST 阳性。结果表明,没有一种动物对三种检测均呈阳性,6 例 DST 阳性动物 SIT 为阴性。共有 43 头动物 SIT、DST 或两者均为阳性,两种检测方法具有中度一致性(Cohen's Kappa 0.41;95%置信区间(CI):0.23,0.59)。相比之下,SIT 与 SICCT 之间仅观察到轻微的一致性(Cohen's Kappa 0.18;95%CI:0.02,0.34)。使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型,我们估计了 SIT、SICCT 和 DST 的检测特异性分别为 96.5%(95%CI,92-99%)、99.7%(95%CI:98-100%)和 99.0%(95%CI:97-100%),但敏感性较低,分别为 58%(95%CI:35-87%)、9%(95%CI:3-21%)和 34%(95%CI:18-55%),尽管置信区间较宽且重叠。
综上所述,我们的研究表明,DST 具有与 SICCT 相当的检测特异性,而敏感性介于 SIT 和 SICCT 之间,可用于识别疑似结核病的水牛。我们的研究强调,迫切需要未来进行有详细尸检、对反应和非反应动物进行免疫学和微生物学分析的大型研究,以更好地确定检测性能差异的潜在因素,特别是在 SIT 和 SICCT 之间。