Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):4138-4147. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15074-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Although social vulnerability has been associated with worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes in other cancer types, these effects have not been characterized in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. This study evaluated the association of social vulnerability and oncologic outcomes.
The authors conducted a single-institution cohort study of adult patients with primary and locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma undergoing resection between January 2016 and December 2021. The social vulnerability index (SVI) was measured on a low (SVI 1-39%, least vulnerable) to high (60-100%, most vulnerable) SVI scale. The association of SVI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression.
The study identified 577 patients. The median SVI was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-67), with 195 patients categorized as high SVI and 265 patients as low SVI. The median age, tumor size, histologic subtype, grade, comorbidities, stage, follow-up time, and perioperative chemotherapy and radiation utilization were similar between the high and low SVI cohorts. The patients with high SVI had worse OS (p = 0.07) and RFS (p = 0.016) than the patients with low SVI. High SVI was independently associated with shorter RFS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.54) but not with OS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.56).
High community-level social vulnerability appears to be independently associated with worse RFS for patients undergoing resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma. The effect of patient and community-level social risk factors should be considered in the treatment of patients with extremity sarcoma.
尽管社会脆弱性与其他癌症类型的术后和肿瘤学结果较差相关,但在软组织肉瘤患者中尚未确定这些影响。本研究评估了社会脆弱性与肿瘤学结果的关系。
作者对 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受切除手术的原发性和局部复发性四肢或躯干软组织肉瘤的成年患者进行了单机构队列研究。社会脆弱性指数(SVI)在低(SVI 1-39%,最不易受影响)到高(60-100%,最易受影响)SVI 范围内进行测量。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例风险回归评估 SVI 与总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS)的关系。
该研究共纳入 577 例患者。SVI 的中位数为 44(四分位距 [IQR],19-67),195 例患者归类为高 SVI,265 例患者归类为低 SVI。高 SVI 和低 SVI 组患者的中位年龄、肿瘤大小、组织学亚型、分级、合并症、分期、随访时间以及围手术期化疗和放疗的应用情况相似。高 SVI 患者的 OS(p = 0.07)和 RFS(p = 0.016)均差于低 SVI 患者。多变量分析显示,高 SVI 与较短的 RFS 独立相关(风险比,1.64;95%置信区间,1.06-2.54),但与 OS 无关(HR,1.47;95%CI,0.84-2.56)。
社区层面的高社会脆弱性似乎与接受四肢和躯干软组织肉瘤切除术的患者的 RFS 较差独立相关。在治疗四肢肉瘤患者时,应考虑患者和社区层面的社会风险因素的影响。