Department of Radiology, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, 207 Uehara, Nishihara-Cho, , Nakagami-Gun, Okinawa, 903-0125, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara-Cho, Nakagami-Gun, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 24;14(1):4490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55018-4.
This study aimed to assess the performance of arterial-spin labeling MRA (ASL-MRA) for visualizing the external carotid artery (ECA) branches in comparison with time-of-flight MRA (TOF-MRA) and CT angiography (CTA). We retrospectively selected 31 consecutive patients, who underwent both MRAs and CTA, prior to the intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) for head and neck cancer. Four patients underwent IACRT bilaterally, so we analyzed 35 ECAs. Pseudo-continuous, three-dimensional ASL using a turbo field echo sequence was acquired. For the TOF-MRA and CTA, clinically used parameters were applied. Two observers evaluated each ECA branch with reference to the angiogram at the IACRT, using five-point scale, in consensus. Friedman test for multiple comparisons was applied. ASL-MRA and CTA better visualized the superior thyroid, lingual, facial, submental, transverse facial, and internal maxillary arteries (IMAs) better than TOF-MRA (p < 0.05). In addition, CTA was superior to ASL-MRA in visualizing only submental artery among these arteries (p = 0.0005). Alternatively, the ASL-MRA was superior for visualizing the middle meningeal artery (MMA) and IMA, compared to the CTA (p = 0.0001 and 0.0007, respectively). ASL-MRA was superior to the TOF-MRA and similar to the CTA in visualizing most of ECA branches. Furthermore, ASL-MRA can better visualize the periphery of MMA and IMA than CTA.
本研究旨在评估动脉自旋标记磁共振血管成像(ASL-MRA)在显示颈外动脉(ECA)分支方面的性能,与时间飞跃磁共振血管成像(TOF-MRA)和 CT 血管造影(CTA)进行比较。我们回顾性选择了 31 例连续患者,这些患者在头颈部癌症的动脉内放化疗(IACRT)之前均接受了这两种磁共振血管成像和 CTA。有 4 例患者双侧接受了 IACRT,因此我们分析了 35 条 ECA。采用涡轮场回波序列采集伪连续三维 ASL。TOF-MRA 和 CTA 采用临床使用的参数。两位观察者参考 IACRT 血管造影,使用五分制对每条 ECA 分支进行评估。采用 Friedman 检验进行多重比较。ASL-MRA 和 CTA 比 TOF-MRA 更好地显示了甲状腺上动脉、舌动脉、面动脉、颏下动脉、横动脉和上颌内动脉(IMA)(p<0.05)。此外,在这些动脉中,只有颏下动脉 CTA 比 ASL-MRA 更能显示(p=0.0005)。相反,与 CTA 相比,ASL-MRA 更能显示脑膜中动脉(MMA)和 IMA(p=0.0001 和 0.0007)。与 TOF-MRA 和 CTA 相比,ASL-MRA 更能显示 ECA 的大多数分支。此外,与 CTA 相比,ASL-MRA 更能显示 MMA 和 IMA 的外周。