Mura Maria Consuelo, Carcangiu Vincenzo, Cosso Giovanni, Columbano Nicolò, Sanna Passino Eraldo, Luridiana Sebastiano
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Agris Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;14(4):543. doi: 10.3390/ani14040543.
This study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies between genetic and visual coat color assignment in the Sarcidano Horse and to elucidate potential reasons. Individual DNA from 90 Sarcidano Horses was used for genetic assignment of coat color to explore the correspondence with individual forms containing phenotypical traits. The exon 1 and exon 3 have been genotyped and sequenced to obtain a picture of the coat color distribution in this breed. Surprisingly, once we compared the genetic results with the individual forms reporting the phenotypic data for each subject, a certain degree of non-correspondence between the phenotypic and genetic data in relation to coat color emerged. From the genetic analysis, Chestnuts ( = 58) resulted the most common Sarcidano Horse ( = 58), followed by a quite large number of Blacks ( = 28) and a very small number of Bays ( = 4), whereas phenotypic distribution resulted in 38 Chestnuts, 40 Bays, only 2 Blacks, and 10 Grays (without the possibility of recognizing the true color they carried). Chestnut resulted a very representative coat color, while many horses that visually identified as Bays were genetically Blacks. This discrepancy, that could be due to a variety of individual and external factors, including age, time of year, living situation and dietary condition, suggesting the importance of accurate coat color identification to ensure adequate features registration and reliable prediction of offspring's coat color.
本研究旨在评估撒丁岛马的基因毛色判定与视觉毛色判定之间的差异,并阐明潜在原因。利用90匹撒丁岛马的个体DNA进行毛色的基因判定,以探究与包含表型特征的个体形态之间的对应关系。对第1外显子和第3外显子进行了基因分型和测序,以了解该品种的毛色分布情况。令人惊讶的是,当我们将基因检测结果与报告每个个体表型数据的个体形态进行比较时,毛色的表型数据与基因数据之间出现了一定程度的不对应。从基因分析来看,栗色马(n = 58)是最常见的撒丁岛马(n = 58),其次是数量较多的黑色马(n = 28)和数量极少的枣色马(n = 4),而表型分布为38匹栗色马、40匹枣色马、仅2匹黑色马和10匹灰色马(无法识别它们携带的真实毛色)。栗色是一种非常有代表性的毛色,而许多视觉上判定为枣色的马在基因上却是黑色马。这种差异可能是由多种个体和外部因素造成的,包括年龄、一年中的时间、生活环境和饮食条件,这表明准确的毛色识别对于确保适当的特征记录和可靠预测后代毛色非常重要。