• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活史和熟悉程度在追踪任务中工作犬与非工作犬表现中的作用()

The Role of Life History and Familiarity in Performance of Working and Non-Working Dogs () in a Point-Following Task.

作者信息

McCartney Josephine M, Leavens David A

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;14(4):573. doi: 10.3390/ani14040573.

DOI:10.3390/ani14040573
PMID:38396541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10885941/
Abstract

Domestic dogs are very successful at following human communicative gestures in paradigms such as the object-choice task. Pet dogs also prefer responding to cues given by a familiar cue-giver and this had not been found in working dogs. Therefore, we tested three groups of dogs in the object-choice task ( = 54): the groups were "Actively working" dogs from working dog breeds, pet dogs from "Non-working breeds" and pet dogs from "Working breeds". We found that "Actively working" and "Working breeds" dog groups outperformed "Non-working breeds" in following a point in the object-choice task. We also found that both "Actively working" and "Working breeds" preferred a familiar cue-giver over an unfamiliar one, in contrast to previous findings. Therefore, we conclude that dogs' abilities to perform well in the object-choice task is influenced by the selective history of the breed, and this is then increased by life experience and training.

摘要

在诸如物体选择任务等范式中,家养犬非常善于遵循人类的交流手势。宠物犬也更喜欢对熟悉的提示者给出的线索做出反应,而这在工作犬中尚未发现。因此,我们在物体选择任务中对三组犬(每组54只)进行了测试:这些组分别是来自工作犬品种的“积极工作”犬、来自“非工作犬品种”的宠物犬以及来自“工作犬品种”的宠物犬。我们发现,在物体选择任务中遵循指示方面,“积极工作”犬组和“工作犬品种”犬组的表现优于“非工作犬品种”犬组。我们还发现,与之前的研究结果相反,“积极工作”犬组和“工作犬品种”犬组都更喜欢熟悉的提示者而非不熟悉的提示者。因此,我们得出结论,犬在物体选择任务中表现良好的能力受到品种的选择历史的影响,然后生活经验和训练会增强这种能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/693c402a970f/animals-14-00573-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/b1732b4d990e/animals-14-00573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/e4bf291f341a/animals-14-00573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/fa1d3c72143e/animals-14-00573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/18ef6df1dd63/animals-14-00573-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/dfece7cc2993/animals-14-00573-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/6e46134c3245/animals-14-00573-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/6e126e172627/animals-14-00573-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/3737a8d385b2/animals-14-00573-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/693c402a970f/animals-14-00573-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/b1732b4d990e/animals-14-00573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/e4bf291f341a/animals-14-00573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/fa1d3c72143e/animals-14-00573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/18ef6df1dd63/animals-14-00573-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/dfece7cc2993/animals-14-00573-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/6e46134c3245/animals-14-00573-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/6e126e172627/animals-14-00573-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/3737a8d385b2/animals-14-00573-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0516/10885941/693c402a970f/animals-14-00573-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Life History and Familiarity in Performance of Working and Non-Working Dogs () in a Point-Following Task.生活史和熟悉程度在追踪任务中工作犬与非工作犬表现中的作用()
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;14(4):573. doi: 10.3390/ani14040573.
2
Effect of training and familiarity on responsiveness to human cues in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).训练和熟悉程度对家犬(犬属家犬)对人类线索反应能力的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):805-14. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0714-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
3
A comparison of pet and purpose-bred research dog (Canis familiaris) performance on human-guided object-choice tasks.宠物犬与专门培育用于研究的犬(家犬)在人类引导的物体选择任务中的表现比较。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
4
Do pet dogs () follow ostensive and non-ostensive human gaze to distant space and to objects?宠物狗会跟随人类明示性和非明示性的目光看向远处空间和物体吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jul 26;4(7):170349. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170349. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Reassessing shelter dogs' use of human communicative cues in the standard object-choice task.重新评估收容所犬在标准物体选择任务中对人类交流线索的使用。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213166. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparing pet and detection dogs (Canis familiaris) on two aspects of social cognition.比较宠物犬和搜救犬(家犬)在社会认知的两个方面。
Learn Behav. 2020 Dec;48(4):432-443. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00431-8.
7
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food.家犬(犬科动物)会利用人类的手势而非非人类的标记来寻找隐藏的食物。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Feb;122(1):84-93. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.1.84.
8
Testing dogs in ape-like conditions: the effect of a barrier on dogs' performance on the object-choice task.在类人猿条件下测试狗:障碍物对狗在物体选择任务中表现的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01297-8. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Practice makes perfect: familiarity of task determines success in solvable tasks for free-ranging dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).熟能生巧:对任务的熟悉程度决定了自由放养的狗(家犬)在可解决任务中的成功与否。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jul;20(4):771-776. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1097-3. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Can dogs use vocal intonation as a social referencing cue in an object choice task?狗能在物体选择任务中使用语调作为社会参照线索吗?
Anim Cogn. 2018 Mar;21(2):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1163-5. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Dog-Owner Relationship and Its Association with Social Cognition in French Bulldogs.法国斗牛犬的人与狗的关系及其与社会认知的关联
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/ani15010017.

本文引用的文献

1
The performance of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) on two versions of the object choice task.家犬(Canis lupus familiaris)在两种物体选择任务中的表现。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Sep;24(5):1087-1098. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01500-9. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs.史前犬的起源和遗传遗产。
Science. 2020 Oct 30;370(6516):557-564. doi: 10.1126/science.aba9572. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats.
使用判断偏差测试在宠物和收容所犬(犬属)中:方法学和统计学注意事项。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0241344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241344. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparing the tractability of young hand-raised wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris).比较人工育幼的幼狼(Canis lupus)和狗(Canis familiaris)的可训练性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14678. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71687-3.
5
Dogs and cats prioritize human action: choosing a now-empty instead of a still-baited container.狗和猫优先考虑人类的行为:选择一个现在空的容器,而不是一个仍然有诱饵的容器。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01416-w. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
Comparing pet and detection dogs (Canis familiaris) on two aspects of social cognition.比较宠物犬和搜救犬(家犬)在社会认知的两个方面。
Learn Behav. 2020 Dec;48(4):432-443. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00431-8.
7
The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion.驯化与经验对狗和狼与人类同伴社交互动的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 23;11:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00785. eCollection 2020.
8
Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?狗在延迟满足任务中比狼等待更好的奖励的时间更长:但为什么呢?
Anim Cogn. 2020 May;23(3):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
A wolfdog point of view on the impossible task paradigm.从狼犬的角度看不可能任务范式。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):1073-1083. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01298-7. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Testing dogs in ape-like conditions: the effect of a barrier on dogs' performance on the object-choice task.在类人猿条件下测试狗:障碍物对狗在物体选择任务中表现的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01297-8. Epub 2019 Jul 25.