Bingham J, Okada R, McKusick K, Boucher C, Tarolli E, Alpert N, Strauss W
Eur J Nucl Med. 1985;10(11-12):494-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00252740.
A number of computer programs exist for the determination of ejection fraction from gated blood pool images. Three commercially available algorithms were compared on the same radionuclide data from 50 catheterized patients. The methods used were: (1) simple thresholding, (2) second derivative edge determination, and (3) a combination of these two. There was good correlation with catheterization ejection fraction for all three methods using smoothed data [r = 0.781, 0.77, 0.84 respectively (P less than 0.01)]. However, interobserver variance was significantly decreased (P less than 0.01) by use of the second derivative method when compared with the other two methods and catheterization. Thus, if accuracy and low interobserver variance are required, then a combination of a second derivative and thresholding method is preferable.
有许多计算机程序可用于从门控血池图像中测定射血分数。对来自50例接受心导管检查患者的相同放射性核素数据,比较了三种市售算法。所使用的方法为:(1)简单阈值法,(2)二阶导数边缘测定法,以及(3)这两种方法的组合。对于所有三种使用平滑数据的方法,与心导管检查射血分数均有良好的相关性[r分别为0.781、0.77、0.84(P<0.01)]。然而,与其他两种方法和心导管检查相比,使用二阶导数法时观察者间差异显著降低(P<0.01)。因此,如果需要准确性和低观察者间差异,那么二阶导数法和阈值法的组合更为可取。