Suppr超能文献

放射性核素左心室射血分数:三种方法的比较

Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Hains A D, Al-Khawaja I, Hinge D A, Lahiri A, Raftery E B

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1987 Mar;57(3):242-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.3.242.

Abstract

Three commercially available computer programs (a semiautomatic method, a manual method, and a regional method) were used to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction from the equilibrium multiple gated radionuclide ventriculograms obtained from 24 normal male subjects and 20 men with heart failure. In the normal subjects the ejection fraction values calculated by each method were significantly different (mean SD) difference between semiautomatic and manual 3.3 (5.8); between semiautomatic and regional 12.0 (6.3); and between manual and regional 8.7 (6.9]. In the patients with heart failure the ejection fraction values calculated by the semiautomatic method differed significantly from those calculated by the manual and regional methods (mean (SD) difference between semiautomatic and manual 3.4 (4.7); between semiautomatic and regional 4.9 (4.9); and between manual and regional 1.5 (6.2]. The ejection fraction values obtained by the semiautomatic method were generally higher and more consistent than those derived from the manual and regional methods. An ejection fraction of greater than or equal to 50% with the semiautomatic method would be regarded as normal but if the same normal range was applied to the regional method nine (38%) of the 24 normal subjects would appear to have an abnormal left ventricular function. Clinicians should be aware that the method used to generate a time-activity curve is an important consideration in the calculation of ejection fraction. Each centre should establish its own range and reproducibility for the method it uses to measure ejection fraction. These values should not be assumed to apply to any other method.

摘要

使用三种市售计算机程序(一种半自动方法、一种手动方法和一种区域方法),根据从24名正常男性受试者和20名心力衰竭男性患者获得的平衡多门控放射性核素心室造影来计算左心室射血分数。在正常受试者中,每种方法计算出的射血分数值存在显著差异(均值±标准差),半自动与手动方法之间的差异为3.3(5.8);半自动与区域方法之间的差异为12.0(6.3);手动与区域方法之间的差异为8.7(6.9)。在心力衰竭患者中,半自动方法计算出的射血分数值与手动和区域方法计算出的射血分数值存在显著差异(均值±标准差),半自动与手动方法之间的差异为3.4(4.7);半自动与区域方法之间的差异为4.9(4.9);手动与区域方法之间的差异为1.5(6.2)。半自动方法获得的射血分数值通常比手动和区域方法得出的值更高且更一致。半自动方法得出的射血分数大于或等于50%被视为正常,但如果将相同的正常范围应用于区域方法,24名正常受试者中有9名(38%)似乎左心室功能异常。临床医生应意识到,用于生成时间-活度曲线的方法是计算射血分数时的一个重要考虑因素。每个中心应为其用于测量射血分数的方法建立自己的范围和可重复性。不应假定这些值适用于任何其他方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
A noninvasive scintiphotographic method for detecting regional ventricular dysfunction in man.
N Engl J Med. 1971 May 27;284(21):1165-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197105272842101.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验