Grudzińska Ewa, Durajczyk Magdalena, Grudziński Marek, Marchewka Łukasz, Modrzejewska Monika
Second Chair and Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 13;13(4):1067. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041067.
The variability of the obtained results of manual tests assessing the angle of strabismus depends on the experience, skills, and training of the examiner. The authors hope that this new measuring device will provide a more sensitive and repeatable method for detecting small strabismus angles compared to the gold standard-PCT. The purpose of this article is to present an innovative strabismus angle demonstration device, called Strabiscan, to provide automated measurements of eye deviation and to compare the obtained results of these measurements to the traditional manual method.
For patients with manifest strabismic disease ( = 30) and a group of healthy subjects ( = 30), a detailed history was taken and routine ophthalmologic examinations were performed, including best-corrected distance visual acuity, assessment of refractive error using an autorefractometer after cycloplegia, biomicroscopic evaluation of the anterior segment of the eye and evaluation of the eye fundus by indirect ophthalmoscopy. Subsequently, each patient and healthy subject was subjected to a prismatic cover-uncover test using a manual method, after which the presence of strabismus was detected and its angle assessed using a Strabiscan demonstration device.
In the control group using the Strabiscan demonstration device, small-angle latent strabismus ≤ 3DP was diagnosed in 83% of patients, while >3DP was found in 13%. In contrast, using the prismatic cover-uncover test, latent strabismus ≤ 3DP was diagnosed in only 13% of patients, and latent strabismus with an angle > 3DP was found in 13% of patients. No statistically significant differences were noted in the measurements of strabismus angles made by the different methods.
The Strabiscan demonstration device allows quick and accurate assessment of the strabismus angle. Compared to the prismatic cover-uncover test, it has a higher sensitivity for detecting low-angle latent strabismus. Measurements with the Strabiscan do not require the presence of additional assistants for the test.
手动测试评估斜视角度所获得结果的变异性取决于检查者的经验、技能和培训。作者希望,与金标准——棱镜遮盖试验(PCT)相比,这种新型测量设备将为检测小斜视角度提供一种更灵敏且可重复的方法。本文的目的是介绍一种名为Strabiscan的创新性斜视角度演示设备,以提供眼位偏斜的自动测量,并将这些测量所获得的结果与传统手动方法进行比较。
对于30例显性斜视疾病患者和30例健康受试者,详细记录病史并进行常规眼科检查,包括最佳矫正远视力、睫状肌麻痹后使用自动验光仪评估屈光不正、眼前节生物显微镜检查以及间接检眼镜检查眼底。随后,每位患者和健康受试者均采用手动方法进行棱镜遮盖试验,之后使用Strabiscan演示设备检测斜视的存在并评估其角度。
在使用Strabiscan演示设备的对照组中,83%的患者被诊断为小角度潜在性斜视≤3棱镜度(Δ),而13%的患者斜视度>3Δ。相比之下,使用棱镜遮盖试验时,仅13%的患者被诊断为潜在性斜视≤3Δ,13%的患者斜视角度>3Δ。不同方法测量的斜视角度之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
Strabiscan演示设备可快速、准确地评估斜视角度。与棱镜遮盖试验相比,它在检测低角度潜在性斜视方面具有更高的灵敏度。使用Strabiscan进行测量时,测试无需额外的助手在场。