Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.042. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Quality rating systems exist to grade the value of care provided by hospitals, but the extent to which these rating systems correlate with patient outcomes is unclear. The association of quality rating systems and hospital characteristics with excess readmission penalties for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was studied.
The fiscal year 2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment System final rule was used to identify 2,286 hospitals subject to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Overall, 6 hospital quality rating systems and 5 hospital characteristics were obtained. These factors were analyzed to determine the effect on hospital penalties for THA and TKA excess readmissions.
Hospitals that achieved a higher Medicare Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating demonstrated a significantly lower likelihood of receiving THA and TKA readmission penalties (Cramer's V = 0.236 and R = -0.233; P < .001 for both). Hospitals ranked among the US News & World Report's top 50 best hospitals for orthopaedics were significantly less likely to be penalized (V = 0.042; P = .043). The remaining 4 quality rating systems were not associated with readmission penalties. Penalization was more likely for hospitals with fewer THA and TKA discharges (R = -0.142; P < .001), medium-sized institutions (100 to 499 beds; V = 0.075; P = .002), teaching hospitals (V = 0.049; P = .019), and safety net hospitals (V = 0.043; P = .039). Penalization was less likely for West and Midwest hospitals (V = 0.112; P < .001).
A higher Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating and recognition among the US News & World Report's top 50 orthopaedic hospitals were associated with a reduced likelihood of THA and TKA readmission penalties. The other 4 widely accepted quality rating systems did not correlate with readmission penalties. Teaching and safety net hospitals may be biased toward higher readmission rates.
质量评级系统旨在对医院提供的护理价值进行分级,但这些评级系统与患者结局的相关性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨质量评级系统和医院特征与全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的过度再入院处罚之间的关系。
使用 2022 财年住院患者前瞻性支付系统最终规则确定了 2286 家受医院再入院减少计划约束的医院。共获得了 6 个医院质量评级系统和 5 个医院特征。分析这些因素以确定其对 THA 和 TKA 过度再入院的医院处罚的影响。
获得更高的医疗保险整体医院质量星级评定的医院,THA 和 TKA 再入院处罚的可能性显著降低(Cramer's V = 0.236 和 R = -0.233;两者均 P <.001)。在美国新闻与世界报道的骨科最佳 50 强医院中排名靠前的医院受到处罚的可能性显著降低(V = 0.042;P =.043)。其余 4 个质量评级系统与再入院处罚无关。THA 和 TKA 出院量较少的医院(R = -0.142;P <.001)、中型机构(100 至 499 张床;V = 0.075;P =.002)、教学医院(V = 0.049;P =.019)和安全网医院(V = 0.043;P =.039)更有可能受到处罚。西部地区和中西部地区的医院受到处罚的可能性较小(V = 0.112;P <.001)。
更高的整体医院质量星级评定和在美国新闻与世界报道的骨科前 50 强医院中的认可与 THA 和 TKA 再入院处罚的可能性降低相关。其他 4 个广泛认可的质量评级系统与再入院处罚无关。教学和安全网医院可能偏向于更高的再入院率。