Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Research Priority Area Yield, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 May;37(3):e13216. doi: 10.1111/jar.13216.
Adolescents with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability face peer resistance challenges, risking harmful or dangerous situations.
We designed a peer resistance group intervention at school for adolescents with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability, tested its feasibility (N = 4, M = 14.1, M = 78.8), adapted it, and tested it again (N = 6, M = 15.0, M = 72.8).
Study 1 demonstrated feasibility in recruitment, resources, and potential benefits on the distal outcome risk taking. However, attendance, obtained knowledge, and potential benefits on peer resistance, peer problems, and prosocial behaviour were suboptimal. Consequently, study 2 contained more learning by doing and individual lessons, resulting in higher attendance and greater personalization. While potential benefits on improved peer resistance measures were not observed, risk taking improved.
Despite finding no potential benefits on peer resistance, running a peer resistance intervention for adolescents with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability at school is considered feasible.
轻度至边缘智力障碍的青少年面临同伴抵制的挑战，面临危险或危险的情况。
我们为轻度至边缘智力障碍的青少年在学校设计了一个同伴抵制小组干预措施，测试了其可行性（N=4，M=14.1，M=78.8），对其进行了调整，并再次进行了测试（N=6，M=15.0，M=72.8）。
研究 1 表明在招募、资源和风险承担的远程结果方面具有潜在益处。然而，出勤率、获得的知识以及同伴抵制、同伴问题和亲社会行为方面的潜在益处并不理想。因此，研究 2 包含了更多的实践学习和个性化课程，从而提高了出勤率和个性化程度。尽管没有观察到改善同伴抵制措施的潜在益处，但风险承担有所改善。
尽管没有发现同伴抵制的潜在益处，但在学校为轻度至边缘智力障碍的青少年开展同伴抵制干预措施被认为是可行的。
