• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口内扫描仪记录颌间关系时,扫描范围和图像数量对记录精确度的影响。

Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University.

出版信息

J Oral Sci. 2024 Apr 16;66(2):111-115. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0379. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.2334/josnusd.23-0379
PMID:38403675
Abstract

PURPOSE

The effect of scan range and the number of scanned images on the precision of in vivo intermaxillary relationship reproduction was evaluated using digital scans acquired with an intraoral scanner.

METHODS

The study involved 15 participants with normal occlusion. Two different interocclusal recording settings were employed using the intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4): 'MIN,' focusing on the minimal scan range of the first molar region, and 'MAX,' including the scan range from the right first premolar to the right second molar. These settings were combined with three different image counts, resulting in six experimental conditions. Interocclusal recordings were performed four times for each condition. Dimensional discrepancies between datasets were analyzed using three-dimensional morphometric software and compared using two-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Median dimensional discrepancies (interquartile range; IQR) of 39.2 (30.7-49.4), 42.2 (32.6-49.3), 30.3 (26.8-44.1), 20.1 (16.0-34.8), 21.8 (19.0-25.1), and 26.6 (19.9-34.5) µm were found for MIN/200, MIN/400, MIN/600, MAX/200, MAX/400, and MAX/600, respectively. Significant differences in dimensional discrepancies according to scan range were found. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences between MAX and MIN (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Scan range may affect the precision of intermaxillary relationship reproduction. Thus, scanning of the most extensive region practically achievable is recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过使用口内扫描仪获取的数字扫描,评估扫描范围和扫描图像数量对体内颌间关系再现精度的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 15 名正常咬合的参与者。使用口内扫描仪(TRIOS 4)采用两种不同的颌间记录设置:“MIN”,关注第一磨牙区域的最小扫描范围;“MAX”,包括从右侧第一前磨牙到右侧第二磨牙的扫描范围。这两种设置与三种不同的图像数量相结合,共产生了六种实验条件。对于每种条件,都进行了四次颌间记录。使用三维形态计量学软件分析数据集之间的尺寸差异,并使用双向方差分析进行比较。

结果

MIN/200、MIN/400、MIN/600、MAX/200、MAX/400 和 MAX/600 的中位数尺寸差异(四分位距;IQR)分别为 39.2(30.7-49.4)、42.2(32.6-49.3)、30.3(26.8-44.1)、20.1(16.0-34.8)、21.8(19.0-25.1)和 26.6(19.9-34.5)µm。根据扫描范围,尺寸差异存在显著差异。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验显示 MAX 和 MIN 之间存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。

结论

扫描范围可能会影响颌间关系再现的精度。因此,建议扫描尽可能广泛的区域。

相似文献

1
Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner.口内扫描仪记录颌间关系时,扫描范围和图像数量对记录精确度的影响。
J Oral Sci. 2024 Apr 16;66(2):111-115. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0379. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.使用数字和传统技术进行牙合记录精度的临床评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):611-617. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.临床研究比较三种不同设备获取的牙合记录的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1957-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04174-2. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.常规和完全数字化咬合记录方法准确性的三维分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.理解扫描跨度对口腔内和台式扫描仪准确性的影响。
J Dent. 2022 Sep;124:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy.切断、重叠和重新扫描程序对口腔内扫描准确性影响的临床评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.017. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
[Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].[口内扫描仪全牙弓扫描的扫描时间与准确性:口内头部模拟器与手持模型条件下的比较研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 9;56(6):570-575. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210221-00082.
8
Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.扫描技术对无牙上颌骨口腔内扫描系统准确性和速度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;32(9):821-828. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13633. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study.不同咬合记录方法重复性评估的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr;131(4):709-717. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.重新扫描网格孔和拼接程序对口腔内扫描仪全牙弓扫描精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2021 Jul;110:103690. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103690. Epub 2021 May 12.