Silva Gabrielle P, Mendes Ryanne C M G, Lopes Camila T, Lopes Marcos Vo, Perrelli Jaqueline Ga, Mangueira Suzana O, Linhares Francisca Mp
Nursing Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Nursing Department and Surgical Clinic, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jan;36(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12464. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
To analyze evidence of content validity of the nursing diagnosis (ND) Risk for Unstable Blood Pressure in incarcerated women. METHOD: A methodological study assessing the content validity of an ND, was performed in Brazil, between June and September 2022, with 49 nurses as experts. The label, definition, and relevance of the 19 risk factors of the ND Risk for Unstable Blood Pressure were appraised. Based on the predictive diversity model, the content validity index (CVI) and respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor. A CVI ≥ 0.8 was considered adequate evidence of content validity.
The label and the definition of the diagnosis was reformulated. The relevance of 19 etiological factors showed a CVI ≥ 0.8. According to the recommendation of the panel of experts, one of the etiological factors was split in two and two label of etiological factors were changed.
A new label (Risk for Imbalanced Blood Pressure), new definition, and 20 etiological factors (11 risk factors, five associated conditions, and four at-risk populations) of the ND Risk for Unstable Blood Pressure in incarcerated women were considered valid.
NANDA-I accepted the proposal for this nursing diagnosis; hence this study contributed to updating the classification based on scientific evidence. This evidence will favor diagnostic reasoning and recognition of the diagnosis during clinical assessment, and support studies assessing the clinical validity of these elements in incarcerated women.
分析被监禁女性护理诊断“血压不稳定风险”的内容效度证据。方法:2022年6月至9月在巴西进行了一项评估护理诊断内容效度的方法学研究,49名护士作为专家参与。对“血压不稳定风险”护理诊断的19个风险因素的标签、定义及相关性进行了评估。基于预测多样性模型,计算每个风险因素的内容效度指数(CVI)及相应的95%置信区间。CVI≥0.8被视为内容效度的充分证据。
对诊断的标签和定义进行了重新表述。19个病因因素的相关性显示CVI≥0.8。根据专家小组的建议,将其中一个病因因素一分为二,并更改了两个病因因素的标签。
被监禁女性护理诊断“血压不稳定风险”的新标签(血压失衡风险)、新定义及20个病因因素(11个风险因素、5个相关状况和4个高危人群)被认为是有效的。
北美护理诊断协会(NANDA - I)接受了该护理诊断的提议;因此,本研究有助于基于科学证据更新分类。这一证据将有助于临床评估过程中的诊断推理和诊断识别,并支持评估这些因素在被监禁女性中临床效度的研究。