• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating LET and ALL for Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in ACLR Are Fragile: A Systematic Review.评估LET和ALL用于前交叉韧带重建术中前外侧旋转不稳定的随机对照试验存在缺陷:一项系统评价。
Sports Health. 2025 Aug 6:19417381251360013. doi: 10.1177/19417381251360013.
2
The Statistical Fragility of Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.全膝关节置换术中髌骨表面置换的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Mar;40(3):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
The statistical fragility of arthroplasty versus fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.人工关节置换术与股骨颈骨折内固定术的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Hip Int. 2025 Jul;35(4):410-417. doi: 10.1177/11207000251343279. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.随机对照试验比较骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在前交叉韧带重建术中的应用:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
5
Randomized trials evaluating volar locking plates against casting of distal radius fractures are statistically fragile: A systematic review.评估掌侧锁定钢板与桡骨远端骨折石膏固定效果的随机试验在统计学上缺乏说服力:一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 21;64:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.014. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
The fragility of statistical findings in the intertrochanteric fracture fixation literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.转子间骨折固定文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 22;145(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05804-0.
7
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in the Femoral Neck Fracture Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.股骨颈骨折文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e230-e237. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002793.
8
How statistically fragile are randomized controlled trials comparing quadriceps tendon autografts with hamstring or bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?在膝关节前交叉韧带重建中,比较股四头肌肌腱自体移植与腘绳肌或髌腱-骨自体移植的随机对照试验在统计学上有多不可靠?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12535.
9
Kinematic vs. mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A statistical analysis of randomized control trials utilizing dichotomous and continuous fragility metrics.全膝关节置换术中的运动学对线与机械对线:利用二分法和连续脆性指标对随机对照试验的统计分析
J Orthop. 2025 May 10;65:204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
The reverse fragility index: RCTs reporting non-significant differences in failure rates between hamstring and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts have fragile results.反向脆弱指数:随机对照试验报告在腘绳肌和骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物之间失败率无显著差异的研究结果存在脆弱性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3412-3419. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07420-0. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining an Anterolateral Complex Procedure With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Graft Reinjury Without Increasing the Rate of Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.将前外侧复合体手术与前交叉韧带重建相结合可减少移植物再损伤且不增加并发症发生率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jan 12:3635465241285887. doi: 10.1177/03635465241285887.
2
The Statistical Fragility of Tranexamic Acid Use in the Orthopaedic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.《矫形外科文献中氨甲环酸使用的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价》。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun 1;32(11):508-515. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00503. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in the Femoral Neck Fracture Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.股骨颈骨折文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e230-e237. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002793.
4
The Statistical Fragility of Marrow Stimulation for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Cartilage. 2024 Dec;15(4):389-398. doi: 10.1177/19476035241233441. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
5
Combining an Anterolateral Complex Procedure With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces the Graft Reinjury Rate and Improves Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.将前外侧复合体手术与前交叉韧带重建相结合可降低移植物再损伤率并改善临床结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jul;52(8):2129-2147. doi: 10.1177/03635465231198494. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Statistical Outcomes Guiding Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention and Revision Are Fragile: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.统计结果指导人工关节置换感染预防和翻修是脆弱的:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1869-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.059. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
7
The fragility of statistical findings in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.反式全肩关节置换文献中统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1650-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
8
Fragility Index, Reverse Fragility Index, Fragility Quotients, and Susceptibility Index. Novel tools for assessing of randomized clinical trials.脆弱性指数、反向脆弱性指数、脆弱性商数和易感性指数。评估随机临床试验的新工具。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Jan;102(1):41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
9
The Reverse Fragility Index for Mortality End Points in Randomized Trials Comparing Uncemented and Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Intracapsular Hip Fractures.比较非骨水泥型与骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗囊内髋部骨折的随机试验中死亡率终点的反向脆弱性指数
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.034. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
10
Combined anterior cruciate ligament revision with reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament does not improve outcome at 2-year follow-up compared to isolated acl revision; a randomized controlled trial.与单纯前交叉韧带(ACL)重建相比,联合前交叉韧带重建与前外侧韧带重建在 2 年随访时并不能改善结局:一项随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):5077-5086. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07558-x. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

评估LET和ALL用于前交叉韧带重建术中前外侧旋转不稳定的随机对照试验存在缺陷:一项系统评价。

Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating LET and ALL for Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in ACLR Are Fragile: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Yendluri Avanish, Gonzalez Christopher, Koehne Niklas H, Locke Auston R, Cuadros Adriano, Kantrowitz David E, Bienstock Dennis M, Alaia Michael J, Waterman Brian R, Li Xinning, Parisien Robert L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sports Health. 2025 Aug 6:19417381251360013. doi: 10.1177/19417381251360013.

DOI:10.1177/19417381251360013
PMID:40770846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12331626/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction have been adopted by some surgeons as augmentations during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve anterolateral rotatory instability.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the statistical robustness of outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical significance of LET and ALL reconstruction in ACLR.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched. RCTs published January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2024 assessing LET and ALL reconstruction during ACLR were included. Fragility index (FI) or reverse FI (rFI) was calculated for each outcome, representing the number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. The fragility quotient (FQ) was determined by dividing the FI or rFI by sample size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

RESULTS

Of 112 RCTs screened for inclusion, 17 were included for analysis, resulting in 51 total outcomes. The median FI across the 51 outcomes was 4 [interquartile range (IQR), 2-7] with an associated median FQ of 0.031 (IQR, 0.014-0.049). Statistically significant outcomes were more fragile (median FI, 3.5; median FQ, 0.015) than statistically nonsignificant outcomes (median rFI, 5; median FQ, 0.038). In 60.8% of all outcomes (31 of 51), the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the outcome's respective FI or rFI. In the 7 RCTs assessing LET, the median FQ was 0.015 (IQR, 0.012-0.042) across 23 outcomes. In the 10 RCTs assessing ALL, the median FQ was 0.035 (IQR, 0.019-0.051) across 28 outcomes. Graft failure, pivot shift, and Lachman/anterior laxity were the most common outcome categories reported, with median FQs of 0.017, 0.035, and 0.048, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes reported in RCTs for LET and ALL reconstruction as augments of ACLR are statistically fragile, emphasizing the need for additional robust and adequately powered RCTs to better understand the impact of anterolateral augmentation on ACLR outcomes.

摘要

背景

一些外科医生在进行前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)时采用外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)和前外侧韧带(ALL)重建术作为增强手术,以改善前外侧旋转不稳定。

目的

本研究的目的是评估在评估LET和ALL重建在ACLR中的临床意义的随机对照试验(RCT)中报告的结果的统计稳健性。

方法

系统检索了PubMed、Embase和MEDLINE。纳入2010年1月1日至2024年12月31日发表的评估ACLR期间LET和ALL重建的RCT。计算每个结果的脆弱性指数(FI)或反向脆弱性指数(rFI),分别代表改变显著和非显著结果的统计显著性所需的事件逆转数。脆弱性商数(FQ)通过将FI或rFI除以样本量来确定。

证据水平

1级。

结果

在筛选纳入的112项RCT中,17项被纳入分析,共产生51个结果。51个结果的中位数FI为4[四分位间距(IQR),2 - 7],相关的中位数FQ为0.031(IQR,0.014 - 0.049)。具有统计学显著性的结果比无统计学显著性的结果更脆弱(中位数FI,3.5;中位数FQ,0.015)(中位数rFI,5;中位数FQ,0.038)。在所有结果的60.8%(51个中的31个)中,失访患者数量大于结果各自的FI或rFI。在评估LET的7项RCT中,23个结果的中位数FQ为0.015(IQR,0.012 - 0.042)。在评估ALL的10项RCT中,28个结果的中位数FQ为0.035(IQR,0.019 - 0.051)。移植物失败、轴移和Lachman试验/前侧松弛是报告的最常见结果类别,中位数FQ分别为0.017、0.035和0.048。

结论

RCT中报告的作为ACLR增强术的LET和ALL重建的结果在统计学上是脆弱的,强调需要更多有力且有足够样本量的RCT来更好地了解前外侧增强对ACLR结果的影响。