Suppr超能文献

质子治疗与容积调强弧形放疗在高危复发性乳腺癌综合再照射中对臂丛神经保护的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Proton Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brachial Plexus Sparing in the Comprehensive Reirradiation of High-Risk Recurrent Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Choi J Isabelle, McCormick Beryl, Park Peter, Millar Mark, Walker Katherine, Tung Chih Chun, Huang Sheng, Florio Peter, Chen Chin-Cheng, Lozano Alicia, Hanlon Alexandra L, Fox Jana, Xu Amy J, Zinovoy Melissa, Mueller Boris, Bakst Richard, LaPlant Quincey, Braunstein Lior Z, Khan Atif J, Powell Simon N, Cahlon Oren

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

New York Proton Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Aug 18;9(2):101355. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101355. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recurrent or new primary breast cancer requiring comprehensive regional nodal irradiation after prior radiation therapy (RT) to the supraclavicular area and upper axilla is challenging due to cumulative brachial plexus (BP) dose tolerance. We assessed BP dose sparing achieved with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In an institutional review board-approved planning study, all patients with ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer treated with PBS-PT re-RT (PBT1) with at least partial BP overlap from prior photon RT were identified. Comparative VMAT plans (XRT1) using matched BP dose constraints were developed. A second pair of proton (PBT2) and VMAT (XRT2) plans using standardized target volumes were created, applying uniform prescription dose of 50.4 per 1.8 Gy and a maximum BP constraint <25 Gy. Incidence of brachial plexopathy was also assessed.

RESULTS

Ten consecutive patients were identified. Median time between RT courses was 48 months (15-276). Median first, second, and cumulative RT doses were 50.4 Gy (range, 42.6-60.0), 50.4 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (45.0-64.4), and 102.4 Gy (RBE) (95.0-120.0), respectively. Median follow-up was 15 months (5-33) and 18 months for living patients (11-33) Mean BP max was 37.5 Gy (RBE) for PBT1 and 36.9 Gy for XRT1. Target volume coverage of V85% (volume receiving 85% of prescription dose), V90%, and V95% were numerically lower for XRT1 versus PBT1. Similarly, axilla I-III and supraclavicular area coverage were significantly higher for PBT2 than XRT2 at dose levels of V55%, V65%, V75%, V85%, and V95%. Only axilla I V55% did not reach significance ( = .06) favoring PBS-PT. Two patients with high cumulative BPmax (95.2 Gy [RBE], 101.6 Gy [RBE]) developed brachial plexopathy symptoms with ulnar nerve distribution neuropathy without pain or weakness (1 of 2 had symptom resolution after 6 months without intervention).

CONCLUSIONS

PBS-PT improved BP sparing and target volume coverage versus VMAT. For patients requiring comprehensive re-RT for high-risk, nonmetastatic breast cancer recurrence with BP overlap and reasonable expectation for prolonged life expectancy, PBT may be the preferred treatment modality.

摘要

目的

既往接受过锁骨上区域和腋窝上部放射治疗(RT)后,复发或新发的原发性乳腺癌需要进行全面的区域淋巴结照射,由于臂丛神经(BP)累积剂量耐受性,这具有挑战性。我们评估了笔形束扫描质子治疗(PBS-PT)和光子容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)实现的BP剂量 sparing。

方法和材料

在一项经机构审查委员会批准的计划研究中,确定了所有接受PBS-PT再程放疗(PBT1)治疗同侧复发性乳腺癌且至少部分BP与先前光子放疗重叠的患者。制定了使用匹配BP剂量限制的对比VMAT计划(XRT1)。创建了第二组质子(PBT2)和VMAT(XRT2)计划,使用标准化靶区体积,应用每1.8 Gy 50.4的均匀处方剂量和最大BP限制<25 Gy。还评估了臂丛神经病变的发生率。

结果

连续确定了10例患者。放疗疗程之间的中位时间为48个月(15 - 276个月)。首次、第二次和累积放疗的中位剂量分别为50.4 Gy(范围42.6 - 60.0)、50.4 Gy相对生物效应(RBE)(45.0 - 64.4)和102.4 Gy(RBE)(95.0 - 120.0)。中位随访时间为15个月(5 - 33个月),存活患者为18个月(11 - 33个月)。PBT1的平均BP最大值为37.5 Gy(RBE),XRT1为36.9 Gy。XRT1的V85%(接受85%处方剂量的体积)、V90%和V95%的靶区体积覆盖率在数值上低于PBT1。同样,在V55%、V65%、V75%、V85%和V95%的剂量水平下,PBT2对腋窝I - III和锁骨上区域的覆盖率显著高于XRT2。只有腋窝I的V55%支持PBS-PT未达到显著性(P = 0.06)。两名累积BP最大值较高(95.2 Gy [RBE],101.6 Gy [RBE])的患者出现了臂丛神经病变症状,表现为尺神经分布的神经病变,无疼痛或无力(2例中有1例在未干预的情况下6个月后症状缓解)。

结论

与VMAT相比,PBS-PT改善了BP sparing和靶区体积覆盖率。对于需要对高危、非转移性乳腺癌复发进行全面再程放疗且BP重叠且预期寿命延长的患者,PBT可能是首选的治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c7/10885571/cf19623d58d0/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验