Ivy Kathryn S, Larson Allison R
Boston University School of Medicine.
Boston University Medical Center / Boston University School of Medicine.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Jul 3;6:120. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000120. eCollection 2017.
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. : In recent years there has been increasing emphasis on active and engaged learning in medical education. The purpose of this study was to determine medical student satisfaction and performance in a module where 44% of the educational time was spent in a combination of large group engaged learning sessions and at-home modules. : Over two years a week-long dermatology course was transitioned to a format that included numerous large group interactive sessions. Course satisfaction results, exam performance, and a questionnaire on engaged learning were assessed. : Overall course satisfaction improved from 94% to 99% of students ranking the course as good or excellent as did the percent of students who rated lecture delivery as engaging (88% to 98%). The percent of students responding that the module provided opportunities for collaboration among students rose from 50% to 92%. We took away a number of learning points from these sessions based on student feedback, including a need to be sensitive to the time required for pre-class learning modules and the format of such modules. : Based on student feedback, we found that large group teaching was effective in fostering collaboration as well as improving self-reported comprehension and overall course satisfaction.
本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章:近年来,医学教育越来越强调主动学习和参与式学习。本研究的目的是确定在一个模块中,医学生的满意度和表现,在该模块中,44%的教学时间用于大型团体参与式学习课程和家庭学习模块的组合。
在两年时间里,为期一周的皮肤病学课程转变为包括众多大型团体互动课程的形式。评估了课程满意度结果、考试成绩以及一份关于参与式学习的问卷。
总体课程满意度从94%提高到99%,将课程评为良好或优秀的学生比例以及将讲座授课评为引人入胜的学生比例(从88%提高到98%)均有所提高。认为该模块为学生之间的合作提供了机会的学生比例从50%上升到92%。基于学生反馈,我们从这些课程中获得了一些学习要点,包括需要对课前学习模块所需时间及其形式保持敏感。
基于学生反馈,我们发现大型团体教学在促进合作以及提高自我报告的理解能力和总体课程满意度方面是有效的。