Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚、拉贝洛尔使用者或两者皆有患者的高甘油三酯血症发生率。

Incidence of Hypertriglyceridemia in Patients on Propofol, Clevidipine, or Both.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

College of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Dec;58(12):1187-1192. doi: 10.1177/10600280241232991. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol and clevidipine (PC) are commonly used in the treatment of critically ill patients. While both medications are lipid emulsions, there is limited evidence concerning the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) when these agents are used individually or concurrently.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the effects of propofol, clevidipine, or concurrent PC on triglycerides (TGs) and related outcomes in critically ill adults.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were included if they received ≥24 hours of continuous propofol and/or clevidipine. Excluded were those without TG levels after ≥24 hours of infusion, baseline HTG, acute pancreatitis at admission, or receiving total parenteral nutrition with lipids. The primary outcome was incidence of HTG (defined as a TG level >400 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included median and peak TG levels, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, total lipid infused, time to peak TG level, peak lipase level, and development of pancreatitis.

RESULTS

In total, 190 patients were studied: 109 in the propofol group, 50 in the clevidipine group, and 31 in the PC group. Incidence of HTG was similar (19 [17.4%] vs 6 [12%] vs 4 [12.9%] patients, = 0.6246). Peak and median TG levels were similar for propofol, clevidipine, and PC groups (216 mg/dL vs 189.5 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL, = 0.7069; 177 mg/dL vs 185.5 mg/dL vs 177 mg/dL, = 0.6791).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was a similar incidence of HTG in all groups. The results of this study suggest that the concurrent use of PC should not modify the frequency of TG level monitoring.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚和考来维仑(PC)常用于治疗重症患者。虽然这两种药物都是脂乳剂,但关于单独或同时使用这些药物时发生高甘油三酯血症(HTG)的发生率,证据有限。

目的

本研究旨在确定丙泊酚、考来维仑或同时使用 PC 对重症成人的甘油三酯(TGs)和相关结局的影响。

方法

这是一项在学术医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究。如果患者接受了≥24 小时的连续丙泊酚和/或考来维仑输注,则将其纳入研究。排除标准为输注≥24 小时后 TG 水平无变化、基线时 HTG、入院时急性胰腺炎或接受含脂的全胃肠外营养。主要结局是 HTG 的发生率(定义为 TG 水平>400mg/dL)。次要结局包括中位和峰值 TG 水平、住院时间、重症监护病房住院时间、总脂质输注量、达到峰值 TG 水平的时间、峰值脂肪酶水平和胰腺炎的发生。

结果

共有 190 例患者纳入研究:丙泊酚组 109 例,考来维仑组 50 例,PC 组 31 例。HTG 的发生率相似(19[17.4%]例患者 vs 6[12%]例患者 vs 4[12.9%]例患者,=0.6246)。丙泊酚、考来维仑和 PC 组的峰值和中位 TG 水平相似(216mg/dL vs 189.5mg/dL vs 205mg/dL,=0.7069;177mg/dL vs 185.5mg/dL vs 177mg/dL,=0.6791)。

结论和相关性

所有组的 HTG 发生率相似。本研究结果表明,同时使用 PC 不应改变 TG 水平监测的频率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验