• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究诚信与学术医学:发表压力与研究不端行为。

Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct.

机构信息

364432 Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA.

Chair of Simulation and Clinical Education and Chair of Emergency Medicine, Leon Levine Hall of Medical Science, 364432 Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Osteopath Med. 2024 Feb 27;124(5):187-194. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0211. eCollection 2024 May 1.

DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0211
PMID:38407191
Abstract

CONTEXT

This narrative review article explores research integrity and the implications of scholarly work in medical education. The paper describes how the current landscape of medical education emphasizes research and scholarly activity for medical students, resident physicians, and faculty physician educators. There is a gap in the existing literature that fully explores research integrity, the challenges surrounding the significant pressure to perform scholarly activity, and the potential for ethical lapses by those involved in medical education.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review article are to provide a background on authorship and publication safeguards, outline common types of research misconduct, describe the implications of publication in medical education, discuss the consequences of ethical breaches, and outline possible solutions to promote research integrity in academic medicine.

METHODS

To complete this narrative review, the authors explored the current literature utilizing multiple databases beginning in June of 2021, and they completed the literature review in January of 2023. To capture the wide scope of the review, numerous searches were performed. A number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were utilized to identify relevant articles. The MeSH terms included "scientific misconduct," "research misconduct," "authorship," "plagiarism," "biomedical research/ethics," "faculty, medical," "fellowships and scholarships," and "internship and residency." Additional references were accessed to include medical school and residency accreditation standards, residency match statistics, regulatory guidelines, and standard definitions.

RESULTS

Within the realm of academic medicine, research misconduct and misrepresentation continue to occur without clear solutions. There is a wide range of severity in breaches of research integrity, ranging from minor infractions to fraud. Throughout the medical education system in the United States, there is pressure to publish research and scholarly work. Higher rates of publications are associated with a successful residency match for students and academic promotion for faculty physicians. For those who participate in research misconduct, there is a multitude of potential adverse consequences. Potential solutions to ensure research integrity exist but are not without barriers to implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure in the world of academic medicine to publish contributes to the potential for research misconduct and authorship misrepresentation. Lapses in research integrity can result in a wide range of potentially adverse consequences for the offender, their institution, the scientific community, and the public. If adopted, universal research integrity policies and procedures could make major strides in eliminating research misconduct in the realm of academic medicine.

摘要

背景

本文是一篇叙事性综述文章,探讨了医学教育中的研究诚信和学术工作的意义。本文描述了当前医学教育领域如何强调医学学生、住院医师和教师教育者的研究和学术活动。现有文献存在一个空白,即没有充分探讨研究诚信、围绕开展学术活动的巨大压力所带来的挑战,以及参与医学教育的人员可能出现的道德失误。

目的

本文的目的是提供关于作者身份和出版保障的背景知识,概述常见的研究不端行为类型,描述医学教育出版的意义,讨论违反道德规范的后果,并概述在学术医学中促进研究诚信的可能解决方案。

方法

为了完成这篇叙事性综述,作者从 2021 年 6 月开始使用多个数据库搜索现有文献,并于 2023 年 1 月完成文献综述。为了涵盖综述的广泛范围,进行了多次搜索。使用了许多医学主题词 (MeSH) 来识别相关文章。MeSH 术语包括“科学不端行为”、“研究不端行为”、“作者身份”、“剽窃”、“生物医学研究/伦理”、“医学教师”、“奖学金和研究金”以及“实习和住院医师”。还查阅了医学学校和住院医师认证标准、住院医师匹配统计数据、监管准则和标准定义等其他参考文献。

结果

在学术医学领域,研究不端行为和虚假陈述仍在继续,而没有明确的解决方案。研究诚信违规的严重程度差异很大,从轻微违规到欺诈不等。在美国的整个医学教育系统中,都有发表研究和学术工作的压力。学生的住院医师匹配成功率和教师医生的学术晋升与发表率的提高有关。对于那些参与研究不端行为的人来说,可能会有多种潜在的不利后果。确保研究诚信的潜在解决方案确实存在,但在实施方面并非没有障碍。

结论

学术医学领域发表文章的压力导致了研究不端行为和作者身份虚假陈述的潜在可能性。研究诚信的失误可能会给违规者、他们的机构、科学界和公众带来一系列潜在的不利后果。如果采用通用的研究诚信政策和程序,可能会在学术医学领域消除研究不端行为方面取得重大进展。

相似文献

1
Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct.研究诚信与学术医学:发表压力与研究不端行为。
J Osteopath Med. 2024 Feb 27;124(5):187-194. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0211. eCollection 2024 May 1.
2
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Troubling Trends in Biomedical Research Publication: "Publish or Perish" Results in a Propensity for Ethical Violations.生物医学研究出版中的不良趋势:“不发表就出局”导致违反伦理的倾向。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Apr;41(4):859-862. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.017. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
6
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
7
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
8
A Comprehensive and Modality Diverse Cervical Spine and Back Musculoskeletal Physical Exam Curriculum for Medical Students.面向医学生的全面且多模态的颈椎和背部肌肉骨骼物理检查课程
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 31;10(3):SG1-SG8. doi: 10.21980/J8RQ0N. eCollection 2025 Jul.
9
Indirect feedback as a tool for identifying academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicentral study among medical students.间接反馈作为识别学术不端行为的工具:一项针对医学生的横断面多中心研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07444-9.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting retracted research: a dataset and machine learning approaches.预测撤回的研究:一个数据集和机器学习方法。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2025 Jun 11;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-025-00168-w.
2
A Comparative Study on the Construction of Research Integrity in Public Medical Universities/Colleges in China: 2020-2024.中国公立医科大学/学院科研诚信建设的比较研究:2020 - 2024年
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Apr 9;31(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00538-z.
3
Retractions in Otolaryngology Publications.耳鼻喉科学出版物中的撤稿情况。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May 1;151(5):458-465. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0018.
4
Magnitude and Factors Associated with Research Misconduct at a Public University in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.埃塞俄比亚一所公立大学研究不端行为的规模及相关因素:一项横断面调查。
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 20;14:111. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159997.2. eCollection 2025.
5
Analysis of the Use of Sample Size and Effect Size Calculations in a Temporomandibular Disorders Randomised Controlled Trial-Short Narrative Review.颞下颌关节紊乱病随机对照试验中样本量和效应量计算的应用分析——简短叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 19;14(6):655. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060655.