• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制输血与自由输血对伴有心力衰竭的急性心肌梗死合并贫血患者的影响:一项 RCT 亚组分析。

Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusions for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia by Heart Failure Status: An RCT Subgroup Analysis.

机构信息

Université de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT), INSERM U1148, Paris, France.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Research Platform of the East of Paris (URC-CRC-CRB), AP-HP, Hôpital St Antoine, Sorbonne-Université, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT), Paris, France.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2024 Sep;40(9):1705-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

DOI:
10.1016/j.cjca.2024.02.013
PMID:38408702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusion can cause fluid overload. We evaluated the interaction between heart failure (HF) at baseline and transfusion strategy on outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

We used data from the randomized REALITY trial. HF was defined as history of HF or Killip class > 1 at randomization. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): composite of all-cause death, nonrecurrent AMI, stroke, or emergency revascularization prompted by ischemia at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 658 randomized patients, 311 (47.3%) had HF. Patients with HF had higher rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year and higher rates of nonfatal new-onset HF. There was no interaction between HF and effect of randomized assignment on the primary outcome or nonfatal new-onset HF. A liberal transfusion strategy was associated with increased all-cause death at 30 days and at 1 year in patients with HF (P = 0.009 and P = 0.049, respectively). The main numerical difference in cause of death between restrictive and liberal strategies was death by HF at 30 days (4 vs 11).

CONCLUSIONS

HF is frequent in patients with AMI and anemia and is associated with higher risk of MACE (including all-cause death) and nonfatal new-onset HF. Although there was no interaction of HF with effect of transfusion strategy on MACE, a liberal transfusion strategy was associated with higher all-cause death that appears driven by a higher risk of early death caused by HF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02648113.

摘要

背景

红细胞输注可导致液体超负荷。我们评估了基线时心力衰竭(HF)与输血策略对急性心肌梗死(AMI)结局的相互作用。

方法

我们使用了随机 REALITY 试验的数据。HF 定义为随机分组时存在 HF 病史或 Killip 分级>1。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE):全因死亡、非复发性 AMI、卒中和缺血引起的 30 天紧急血运重建的复合终点。

结果

在 658 例随机患者中,311 例(47.3%)有 HF。HF 患者在 30 天和 1 年时的 MACE 发生率更高,新发非致命性 HF 的发生率也更高。HF 与随机分组对主要结局或新发非致命性 HF 的影响之间没有相互作用。在 HF 患者中,自由输血策略与 30 天和 1 年时的全因死亡率增加相关(分别为 P=0.009 和 P=0.049)。限制和自由输血策略之间导致死亡率差异的主要原因是 30 天时 HF 导致的死亡(4 例 vs 11 例)。

结论

AMI 和贫血患者中 HF 较为常见,与更高的 MACE(包括全因死亡)和新发非致命性 HF 风险相关。尽管 HF 与输血策略对 MACE 的影响之间没有相互作用,但自由输血策略与更高的全因死亡率相关,这似乎是由 HF 导致的早期死亡风险增加所驱动。

临床试验注册

NCT02648113。

相似文献

1
Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusions for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia by Heart Failure Status: An RCT Subgroup Analysis.限制输血与自由输血对伴有心力衰竭的急性心肌梗死合并贫血患者的影响:一项 RCT 亚组分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Sep;40(9):1705-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
2
Effect of a Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Major Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: The REALITY Randomized Clinical Trial.限制与宽松输血策略对贫血急性心肌梗死患者主要心血管事件的影响:REALITY 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):552-560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0135.
3
Restrictive vs liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: Rationale and design of the REALITY trial.限制与宽松的红细胞输注策略对急性心肌梗死合并贫血患者的影响:REALITY 试验的原理与设计。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/clc.23453. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia.心肌梗死合并贫血的限制性输血或宽松性输血策略。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 28;389(26):2446-2456. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307983. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
5
Economic evaluation of restrictive vs. liberal transfusion strategy following acute myocardial infarction (REALITY): trial-based cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses.急性心肌梗死后限制性与宽松输血策略的经济学评估(REALITY):基于试验的成本效益分析和成本效用分析
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):194-202. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac029.
6
Liberal transfusion strategy to prevent mortality and anaemia-associated, ischaemic events in elderly non-cardiac surgical patients - the study design of the LIBERAL-Trial.采用自由输血策略预防老年非心脏手术患者的死亡率及贫血相关缺血事件——LIBERAL试验的研究设计
Trials. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3200-3.
7
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support.对于接受强化化疗或放疗或两者联合治疗、有或没有造血干细胞支持的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,采用限制性与宽松性红细胞输血策略的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 27;1(1):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub2.
8
In patients with AMI and anemia, a restrictive vs. liberal blood transfusion strategy was noninferior for 30-d MACE.在 AMI 合并贫血的患者中,限制输血策略与宽松输血策略相比,30 天 MACE 无差异。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):JC77. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ202107200-077. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Six-Month Outcomes after Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后限制输血与自由输血的 6 个月预后比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1224-1233. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808561. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
10
Is a low transfusion threshold safe in critically ill patients with cardiovascular diseases?对于患有心血管疾病的危重症患者,较低的输血阈值是否安全?
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):227-34. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Transfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Anemia, and Heart Failure: Lessons From MINT.急性心肌梗死、贫血和心力衰竭患者的输血:来自MINT研究的经验教训
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;18(4):e012495. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012495. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and comparative frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性心肌梗死中自由输血策略与限制性输血策略:一项随机对照试验的系统评价以及频率论和贝叶斯比较荟萃分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01376-1.