IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain (Moreno-Peral, Conejo-Cerón); Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid (Moreno-Peral, Conejo-Cerón); Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment (Moreno-Peral) and Department of Public Health and Psychiatry (Bellón), University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain; Centre of Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Wijnen, Lokkerbol, Smit); Barcelona Agency of Public Health, Community Health Service, and Center for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health, Barcelona, Spain (Fernández); Department of Clinical Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Smit); El Palo Health Centre, Health District of Primary Care Málaga-Guadalhorce, Málaga, Spain (Bellón).
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jul 1;75(7):667-677. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230101. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
Although evidence supports the effectiveness of psychological interventions for prevention of anxiety, little is known about their cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of health-economic evaluations of psychological interventions for anxiety prevention.
PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EconLit, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, NHS Health Technology Assessment, and OpenGrey databases were searched electronically on December 23, 2022. Included studies focused on economic evaluations based on randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to prevent anxiety. Study data were extracted, and the quality of the selected studies was assessed by using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.
All included studies (N=5) had economic evaluations that were considered to be of good quality. In two studies, the interventions showed favorable cost-effectiveness compared with usual care groups. In one study, the intervention was not cost-effective. Findings from another study cast doubt on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in the remaining study could not be established.
Although the findings suggest some preliminary evidence of cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for preventing anxiety, they were limited by the small number of included studies. Additional research on the cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for anxiety in different countries and populations is required.
尽管有证据支持心理干预预防焦虑的有效性,但对于其成本效益知之甚少。本研究旨在对预防焦虑的心理干预的健康经济评估进行系统评价。
于 2022 年 12 月 23 日在 PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、EconLit、NHS 经济评估数据库、NHS 健康技术评估和 OpenGrey 数据库中进行电子检索。纳入的研究侧重于基于随机对照试验的心理干预预防焦虑的经济评估。提取研究数据,并使用健康经济标准共识和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估所选研究的质量。
所有纳入的研究(N=5)均进行了经济评估,被认为质量良好。在两项研究中,与常规护理组相比,干预措施具有良好的成本效益。在一项研究中,干预措施不具有成本效益。另一项研究的结果对干预措施的成本效益提出了质疑,而剩余研究中干预措施的成本效益则无法确定。
尽管研究结果表明心理干预预防焦虑具有一定的初步成本效益证据,但这些证据受到纳入研究数量较少的限制。需要在不同国家和人群中开展更多关于心理干预预防焦虑的成本效益研究。