Sanchez Gina, Hashmi S Shahrukh, Bednar Erica, Horvath Sarah, Kumar Bhavik, Sagaser Katelynn, Singletary Claire N, Ramdaney Aarti
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1875. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1875. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
Genetic counselors (GCs) are trained to help individuals navigate the medical and psychological implications of genetic test results, familial conditions, and ultrasound anomalies. Therefore, familiarity with reproductive options, including abortion, is vital. However, previous studies have found gaps in GCs' knowledge regarding abortion care and there are currently no recommendations regarding abortion curriculum. This study aimed to assess the state of abortion curriculum in genetic counseling graduate programs in the United States and to examine and compare the satisfaction levels of program representatives and recent graduates. Program representatives and recent graduates were invited to complete an anonymous survey evaluating the abortion curriculum, satisfaction with said curriculum, and perceived preparedness to counsel on abortion. Quantitative data from 46 program representatives and 123 recent graduates were analyzed using descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Large variability existed in the amount and types of abortion training. Results showed greater satisfaction and feelings of preparation to counsel on abortion in graduates whose program provided a dedicated abortion curriculum (p < 0.001, p = 0.005). In addition, graduates with abortion counseling experience felt less prepared to counsel on abortion than their programs believed them to be (p = 0.04). Graduates perceived procedural timing, facilitation of genetic testing, and resources/support desired by patients before, during, or after an abortion, to be the most important topics, although these were not included in all programs' curriculum. Program representatives and recent graduates alike noted that variability in clinical training is a barrier to abortion education. Our results demonstrate a need for curricular reform to reduce variability in training and ensure that all graduates receive the same foundational abortion education. Further research is needed to determine the scope of GCs in abortion care, as well as which topics and education formats are most helpful in graduate education.
遗传咨询师(GCs)经过培训,帮助个人应对基因检测结果、家族疾病和超声异常带来的医学和心理影响。因此,熟悉包括堕胎在内的生殖选择至关重要。然而,先前的研究发现遗传咨询师在堕胎护理知识方面存在差距,目前也没有关于堕胎课程的建议。本研究旨在评估美国遗传咨询研究生项目中堕胎课程的现状,并调查和比较项目代表和近期毕业生的满意度。邀请项目代表和近期毕业生完成一项匿名调查,评估堕胎课程、对该课程的满意度以及在堕胎咨询方面的自我准备程度。使用描述性统计和适当的统计分析方法,包括曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验,对46名项目代表和123名近期毕业生的定量数据进行了分析。堕胎培训的数量和类型存在很大差异。结果显示,其项目提供专门堕胎课程的毕业生对堕胎咨询的满意度更高,且自我准备感觉更好(p < 0.001,p = 0.005)。此外,有堕胎咨询经验的毕业生自我感觉在堕胎咨询方面的准备程度低于其项目的预期(p = 0.04)。毕业生认为堕胎程序的时间安排、基因检测的便利性以及患者在堕胎前、期间或之后所需的资源/支持是最重要的主题,尽管并非所有项目的课程都涵盖这些内容。项目代表和近期毕业生都指出,临床培训的差异是堕胎教育的一个障碍。我们的结果表明需要进行课程改革,以减少培训差异,确保所有毕业生都接受相同的基础堕胎教育。还需要进一步研究来确定遗传咨询师在堕胎护理中的职责范围,以及哪些主题和教育形式对研究生教育最有帮助。