Gentile Brianna J, Araujo Rebecca LeShay, Shamshoni Jessica Kianmahd, Browner Carole H, Palmer Christina G S
Los Angeles Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e2019. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2019.
Prenatal genetic counselors in many states have modified their practices, considering new state-level abortion restrictions enacted after the 2022 US Supreme Court Dobbs decision. Therefore, genetic counselors' preparedness to counsel patients under these restrictions warrants new attention. Using a cross-sectional design, we assessed prenatal genetic counselors' self-efficacy given their exposures to abortion education during and after their graduate training and other variables potentially associated with self-efficacy. Participants were board-certified or eligible prenatal genetic counselors practicing in the United States. They completed an anonymous online survey, which assessed demographics, exposures to abortion topics, and the six-factor Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES; subscale range 0 (low)-100 (high)), answered using context from a hypothetical prenatal case scenario. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared median GCSES factor scores for each demographic and curricular variable. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared coverage of abortion topics according to location of graduate program (restrictive vs. protective state, per Guttmacher Institute). We analyzed 94 surveys (93% female, 53% aged <25-34, 66% restrictive states). GCSES scores skewed high (65.00-100.00). Higher scores on complex skills, communication, genetic testing, and basic psychosocial skills were associated with older age (p's < 0.01), more years since graduation (p's < 0.01), and more years' experience practicing as a prenatal genetic counselor (p's < 0.01); graduate program exposure to counseling about pregnancy termination option was associated with higher scores on complex skills, communication, and genetic testing (p's < 0.05). Participants reported high self-efficacy to address the prenatal scenario regardless of location of graduate program or current practice. Still, if graduate programs wish to increase their coverage of abortion topics, our results indicate that exposures to counseling the option of pregnancy termination through practical experiences, such as clinical rotations or role plays, are the most effective didactic tools for promoting self-efficacy in prenatal sessions.
在美国最高法院2022年做出多布斯裁决后,许多州的产前遗传咨询师改变了他们的做法,考虑到新出台的州一级堕胎限制措施。因此,遗传咨询师在这些限制条件下为患者提供咨询的准备情况值得重新关注。我们采用横断面设计,评估了产前遗传咨询师在研究生培训期间及之后接受堕胎教育的情况以及其他可能与自我效能感相关的变量下的自我效能感。参与者是在美国执业的经委员会认证或符合条件的产前遗传咨询师。他们完成了一项匿名在线调查,该调查评估了人口统计学信息、接触堕胎话题的情况,以及使用一个假设的产前病例场景中的背景信息回答的六因素遗传咨询自我效能量表(GCSES;子量表范围为0(低)-100(高))。Kruskal-Wallis和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了每个人口统计学和课程变量的GCSES因子中位数得分。卡方检验和Fisher精确检验根据研究生项目所在地(根据古特马赫研究所的数据,分为限制堕胎州和保护堕胎州)比较了堕胎话题的涵盖情况。我们分析了94份调查问卷(93%为女性,53%年龄在25-34岁以下,66%来自限制堕胎州)。GCSES得分偏高(65.00-100.00)。复杂技能、沟通、基因检测和基本心理社会技能得分较高与年龄较大(p值<0.01)、毕业时间较长(p值<0.01)以及作为产前遗传咨询师的执业年限较长(p值<0.01)相关;研究生项目中接触过关于终止妊娠选择的咨询与复杂技能、沟通和基因检测方面的较高得分相关(p值<0.05)。无论研究生项目所在地或当前执业地点如何,参与者在处理产前场景时都报告了较高的自我效能感。尽管如此,如果研究生项目希望增加对堕胎话题的涵盖,我们的结果表明,通过临床轮转或角色扮演等实践经验接触关于终止妊娠选择的咨询,是在产前咨询中提高自我效能感最有效的教学工具。