• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危冠状动脉介入治疗期间的经皮左心室减负荷:CHIP-BCIS3 随机对照试验的原理和设计。

Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading During High-Risk Coronary Intervention: Rationale and Design of the CHIP-BCIS3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences at the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, King's College London, United Kingdom (M.R., S.M.E., H.R., D.P.).

King's College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (I.W.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar;17(3):e013367. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013367. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013367
PMID:38410944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10942170/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary disease is associated with a high risk of cardiogenic shock. This can cause harm and limit the quality of revascularization achieved, especially when left ventricular function is impaired at the outset. Elective percutaneous left ventricular unloading is increasingly used to mitigate adverse events in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, but this strategy has fiscal and clinical costs and is not supported by robust evidence.

METHODS

CHIP-BCIS3 (Controlled Trial of High-Risk Coronary Intervention With Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading) is a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial that aims to determine whether a strategy of elective percutaneous left ventricular unloading is superior to standard care (no planned mechanical circulatory support) in patients undergoing nonemergent high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients are eligible for recruitment if they have severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, extensive coronary artery disease, and are due to undergo complex percutaneous coronary intervention (to the left main stem with calcium modification or to a chronic total occlusion with a retrograde approach). Cardiogenic shock and acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction are exclusions. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, cardiovascular hospitalization, and periprocedural myocardial infarction, analyzed using the win ratio. Secondary outcomes include completeness of revascularization, major bleeding, vascular complications, health economic analyses, and health-related quality of life. A sample size of 250 patients will have in excess of 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.62 at a minimum of 12 months, assuming 150 patients experience an event across all follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, 169 patients have been recruited from 21 National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom, with recruitment expected to complete in 2024.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05003817.

摘要

简介

复杂冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心源性休克的风险较高相关。这可能会造成伤害,并限制血运重建的质量,尤其是在最初左心室功能受损的情况下。选择性经皮左心室减压术越来越多地用于减轻高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的不良事件,但这种策略存在财政和临床成本,并且没有得到强有力的证据支持。

方法

CHIP-BCIS3(高危冠状动脉介入治疗中经皮左心室减压术的对照试验)是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签随机对照试验,旨在确定在接受非紧急高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,选择性经皮左心室减压术策略是否优于标准治疗(无计划机械循环支持)。如果患者有严重的左心室收缩功能障碍、广泛的冠状动脉疾病,并且要进行复杂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(左主干伴钙修饰或逆行慢性完全闭塞),则符合入组条件。心源性休克和急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死是排除标准。主要结局是全因死亡、中风、自发性心肌梗死、心血管住院和围手术期心肌梗死的分层复合,使用赢率进行分析。次要结局包括血运重建的完整性、大出血、血管并发症、卫生经济学分析和健康相关生活质量。如果在所有随访中,预计 250 例患者中有 150 例出现事件,则将有超过 80%的效力检测 12 个月时风险比为 0.62 的情况,假设 169 例患者中有 250 例患者入组。

结论

迄今为止,英国 21 家国民保健服务医院已招募了 169 例患者,预计 2024 年完成招募。

注册信息

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT05003817。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/10a798f1d4a9/hcv-17-e013367-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/a7645eeee20c/hcv-17-e013367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/309cfc6a0358/hcv-17-e013367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/b52b9831fbf8/hcv-17-e013367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/4a334e4314db/hcv-17-e013367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/b2f6ebc4b506/hcv-17-e013367-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/10a798f1d4a9/hcv-17-e013367-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/a7645eeee20c/hcv-17-e013367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/309cfc6a0358/hcv-17-e013367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/b52b9831fbf8/hcv-17-e013367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/4a334e4314db/hcv-17-e013367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/b2f6ebc4b506/hcv-17-e013367-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f962/10942170/10a798f1d4a9/hcv-17-e013367-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading During High-Risk Coronary Intervention: Rationale and Design of the CHIP-BCIS3 Randomized Controlled Trial.高危冠状动脉介入治疗期间的经皮左心室减负荷:CHIP-BCIS3 随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar;17(3):e013367. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013367. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol.STICH3C:研究原理和方案。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;16(8):e012527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012527. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
Correlation of Admission Heart Rate With Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Right Coronary Artery ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: HORIZONS-AMI (The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Trial.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的右冠状动脉ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院心率与血管造影及临床结局的相关性:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结局)试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 19;6(7):e006181. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006181.
4
Rationale and design of EXPLORE: a randomized, prospective, multicenter trial investigating the impact of recanalization of a chronic total occlusion on left ventricular function in patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.探讨的理由和设计:一项随机、前瞻性、多中心试验,研究急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性完全闭塞血管再通对左心室功能的影响。
Trials. 2010 Sep 21;11:89. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-89.
5
Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中选择性主动脉内球囊反搏:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):867-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1190.
6
Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.接受使用Impella进行的保护性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的特征与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038509. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
7
Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction: Rationale and Design of the REVIVED-BCIS2 Trial: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.经皮血运重建治疗缺血性心室功能障碍:REVIVED-BCIS2 试验的原理和设计:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗缺血性心肌病。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;6(6):517-526. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.01.024.
8
Optimal strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion (OPTIMAL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.无保护左主干冠状动脉闭塞所致急性心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗优化策略(OPTIMAL):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Mar 8;20(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3211-0.
9
Three-Year Outcomes With Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided or Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction.心肌梗死患者行冠状动脉血运重建治疗:以 Fractional Flow Reserve 指导或血管造影指导下的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 3 年结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun;17(6):e013913. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013913. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.接受使用Impella进行的保护性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的特征与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038509. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Variations in the Medical Device Authorization and Reimbursement Landscape: A Case Study of 2 Cardiovascular Devices Across 4 Countries.医疗器械授权与报销情况的差异:以4个国家的2种心血管器械为例的案例研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Apr;18(4):e011636. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011636. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Microaxial flow pump for high-risk PCI: are we ready for the prime time?

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Preoperative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者术前左心室功能评估的预后价值
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;24(3):80. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403080. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation.经导管三尖瓣反流修复术治疗患者。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 18;388(20):1833-1842. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300525. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
3
A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的微轴流泵:我们准备好迎接黄金时代了吗?
EuroIntervention. 2024 May 10;20(9):530-532. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00044.
Impella支持的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的出血风险综述
Heart Int. 2020 Dec 29;14(2):92-99. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92. eCollection 2020.
4
Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis.Impella 与主动脉内球囊泵在高危 PCI 中的应用:倾向调整的大规模索赔数据集分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Dec 15;185:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.032. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.缺血性左心室功能障碍的经皮血管重建术。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1351-1360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206606. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Prophylactic Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中预防性机械循环支持的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May;15(5):e011534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011534. Epub 2022 May 17.
7
The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂恩格列净治疗急性心力衰竭住院患者的多中心随机试验。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):568-574. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01659-1. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
8
Atrial shunt device for heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF II): a randomised, multicentre, blinded, sham-controlled trial.用于射血分数保留和轻度降低的心力衰竭的心房分流装置(REDUCE LAP-HF II):一项随机、多中心、双盲、假对照试验。
Lancet. 2022 Mar 19;399(10330):1130-1140. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00016-2. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性和风险:对英国 BCIS 数据库 2006-2016 年的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.039.
10
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.