Suppr超能文献

多维冲动性与自杀行为:自杀综合动机 - 意志(IMV)模型的部分检验

Multidimensional Impulsivity and Suicidal Behaviour: A Partial Test of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional (IMV) Model of Suicide.

作者信息

Rasmussen Susan, Martin Bethany, Cramer Robert J

出版信息

Arch Suicide Res. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1):26-44. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2322118. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Suicide remains a public health problem within the United Kingdom (UK) and globally. Impulsivity is a key risk factor within the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model (IMV) of Suicide warranting further study. The current study applied a multi-dimensional impulsivity framework (UPPS-P) to differentiate suicidality subgroups within an IMV framework (i.e., no suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation only, and suicide attempt). Impulsivity subscales were evaluated as moderators of the suicidal ideation-future suicide attempt link.

METHOD

Adults living in the UK ( = 1027) completed an online survey addressing demographics, impulsivity, psychological distress, and lifetime suicidal behavior. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression with simple slopes analyses to investigate study objectives.

RESULTS

Data analyses revealed that: (1) four impulsivity subtypes (negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of premeditation, sensation-seeking) differentially distinguished suicidal behavior groups; (b) negative urgency, positive urgency, and lack of premeditation were meaningfully associated with suicide outcomes, and (c) negative urgency served as a moderator of the suicidal ideation-future attempt link.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgency, regardless of positive or negative valence, is important for understanding differences in lifetime suicidal behavior. Sensation-seeking may play a protective role for direct suicidal behavior. Negative urgency may be the most prominent aspect of impulsivity when considered as an IMV moderator. Findings are contextualized with respect to impulsivity and IMV frameworks. Clinical implications involve accounting for negative urgency in suicide risk assessment and intervention.

摘要

目的

自杀在英国和全球范围内仍是一个公共卫生问题。冲动性是自杀综合动机 - 意志模型(IMV)中的一个关键风险因素,值得进一步研究。本研究应用多维冲动性框架(UPPS - P)在IMV框架内区分自杀亚组(即无自杀行为、仅有自杀意念和自杀未遂)。冲动性分量表被评估为自杀意念与未来自杀未遂之间联系的调节因素。

方法

居住在英国的成年人(n = 1027)完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及人口统计学、冲动性、心理困扰和终生自杀行为。我们使用方差分析(ANOVA)和带有简单斜率分析的线性回归来研究研究目标。

结果

数据分析显示:(1)四种冲动性亚型(消极紧迫性、积极紧迫性、缺乏预谋、寻求刺激)对自杀行为组有不同的区分作用;(2)消极紧迫性、积极紧迫性和缺乏预谋与自杀结果有显著关联;(3)消极紧迫性是自杀意念与未来自杀未遂之间联系的调节因素。

结论

无论正负效价,紧迫性对于理解终生自杀行为的差异都很重要。寻求刺激可能对直接自杀行为起保护作用。当被视为IMV调节因素时,消极紧迫性可能是冲动性最突出的方面。研究结果在冲动性和IMV框架的背景下进行了阐述。临床意义包括在自杀风险评估和干预中考虑消极紧迫性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验