Winstone Lizzy, Heron Jon, John Ann, Kirtley Olivia J, Moran Paul, Muehlenkamp Jennifer, O'Connor Rory C, Mars Becky
Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 9;11:e63132. doi: 10.2196/63132.
The integrated motivational-volitional model (IMV) is one of the leading theoretical models of suicidal thoughts and behavior. There has been a recent proliferation in the assessment of suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm thoughts and behaviors (SHTBs) in daily life.
This systematic review synthesized evidence from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies in the SHTB literature to address the following questions: (1) Which constructs in the IMV model have been assessed using EMA, and how have they been assessed? (2) Do different constructs from the IMV model fluctuate in daily life? (3) What is the relationship between the different IMV constructs and SHTBs in daily life?
Consistent with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted systematic searches of 5 databases-Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Europe PMC Preprints-from inception to March 26, 2024.
Our searches resulted in the inclusion and narrative synthesis of 53 studies across 58 papers. A total of 15 IMV constructs were measured using EMA across the included papers. The most frequently measured constructs were thwarted belongingness (24/58, 41% of the papers), future thinking (20/58, 34% of the papers), and perceived burdensomeness (16/58, 28% of the papers). The least frequently measured constructs were humiliation, social problem-solving, mental imagery, and perceived capability for suicide. None of the included papers measured memory biases, goals, norms, or resilience using EMA. Comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients (45/58, 78% of the papers) revealed moderate but inconsistent within-person variance across all the examined constructs. We found evidence (39/58, 67% of the papers) of concurrent associations between almost all constructs and SHTBs in daily life, with some evidence that entrapment, shame, rumination, thwarted belongingness, hopelessness, social support, and impulsivity are additionally associated with SHTBs in lagged (ie, longitudinal) relationships.
Comparisons were hindered by variation in methodology, including the populations studied, EMA sampling scheme, operationalization of IMV constructs and SHTBs, and statistical approach used. Our findings suggest that EMA studies are a useful methodology for examining risk factors for SHTBs; however, more research is needed for some IMV constructs. Quality assessment suggested several areas for improvement in the reporting of EMA studies in this field.
PROSPERO CRD42022349514; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=349514.
综合动机 - 意志模型(IMV)是自杀想法和行为的主要理论模型之一。近年来,日常生活中对自杀和非自杀性自伤想法与行为(SHTBs)的评估呈激增态势。
本系统评价综合了SHTB文献中生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究的证据,以回答以下问题:(1)IMV模型中的哪些构念已通过EMA进行评估,以及如何评估?(2)IMV模型中的不同构念在日常生活中是否波动?(3)日常生活中IMV不同构念与SHTBs之间的关系是什么?
按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,我们对5个数据库——科学网、Embase、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和欧洲PMC预印本——从创刊到2024年3月26日进行了系统检索。
我们的检索纳入并进行了叙述性综合分析58篇论文中的53项研究。在所纳入的论文中,共使用EMA测量了15个IMV构念。测量最频繁的构念是归属感受挫(24/58,占论文的41%)、未来思维(20/58,占论文的34%)和感知负担感(16/58,占论文的28%)。测量最不频繁的构念是羞辱感、社会问题解决能力、心理意象和自杀感知能力。所纳入的论文均未使用EMA测量记忆偏差、目标、规范或复原力。类内相关系数比较(45/58,占论文的78%)显示,所有被检查构念的个体内方差适中但不一致。我们发现证据(39/58,占论文的67%)表明,几乎所有构念与日常生活中的SHTBs存在同时关联,有一些证据表明,陷入困境、羞耻感、沉思、归属感受挫、绝望、社会支持和冲动性在滞后(即纵向)关系中也与SHTBs相关。
由于方法学的差异,包括所研究的人群、EMA抽样方案、IMV构念和SHTBs的操作化以及所使用的统计方法,比较受到了阻碍。我们的研究结果表明,EMA研究是检查SHTBs风险因素的有用方法;然而,对于一些IMV构念,还需要更多的研究。质量评估表明,该领域EMA研究报告在几个方面有待改进。
PROSPERO CRD420223495;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=349514 。