• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器械嵌顿/丢失于慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中。

Equipment entrapment/loss during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Apr;36(4). doi: 10.25270/jic/23.00266.

DOI:10.25270/jic/23.00266
PMID:38412445
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on equipment loss or entrapment during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We analyzed the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of equipment loss/entrapment at 43 US and non-US centers between 2017 and 2023.

RESULTS

Equipment loss/entrapment was reported in 40 (0.4%) of 10 719 cases during the study period. These included guidewire entrapment/fracture (n = 21), microcatheter entrapment/fracture (n = 11), stent loss (n = 8) and balloon entrapment/fracture/rupture (n = 5). The equipment loss/entrapment cases were more likely to have moderate to severe calcification, longer lesion length, higher J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO complications scores, and use of the retrograde approach compared with the remaining cases. Retrieval was attempted in 71.4% of the guidewire, 90.9% of the microcatheter, 100% of the stent loss, and 100% of the balloon cases, and was successful in 26.7%, 30.0%, 50%, and 40% of the cases, respectively. Procedures complicated by equipment loss/entrapment had higher procedure and fluoroscopy time, contrast volume and patient air kerma radiation dose, lower procedural (60.0% vs 85.6%, P less than .001) and technical (75.0% vs 86.8%, P = .05) success, and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (17.5% vs 1.8%, P less than .001), acute MI (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001), emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (2.5% vs 0.1%, P = .03), perforation (20.0% vs 4.9%, P less than .001), and death (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Equipment loss is a rare complication of CTO PCI; it is more common in complex CTOs and is associated with lower technical success and higher MACE.

摘要

背景

在慢性完全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,器械丢失或嵌顿的数据有限。

方法

我们分析了 2017 年至 2023 年期间 43 个美国和非美国中心的基线临床和血管造影特征以及器械丢失/嵌顿的结局。

结果

在研究期间,报告了 10719 例患者中有 40 例(0.4%)发生器械丢失/嵌顿。这些包括导丝嵌顿/断裂(n=21)、微导管嵌顿/断裂(n=11)、支架丢失(n=8)和球囊嵌顿/断裂/破裂(n=5)。与其余病例相比,器械丢失/嵌顿病例更可能存在中度至重度钙化、较长的病变长度、较高的 J-CTO 和 PROGRESS-CTO 并发症评分以及逆行入路的使用。在 71.4%的导丝、90.9%的微导管、100%的支架丢失和 100%的球囊病例中尝试了取回,分别有 26.7%、30.0%、50%和 40%的病例成功取回。发生器械丢失/嵌顿的操作程序具有更高的操作和透视时间、对比剂体积和患者空气比释动能剂量,更低的操作成功率(60.0% vs 85.6%,P 小于.001)和技术成功率(75.0% vs 86.8%,P=.05),更高的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率(17.5% vs 1.8%,P 小于.001)、急性心肌梗死(7.5% vs 0.4%,P 小于.001)、急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(2.5% vs 0.1%,P=.03)、穿孔(20.0% vs 4.9%,P 小于.001)和死亡(7.5% vs 0.4%,P 小于.001)。

结论

器械丢失是 CTO PCI 的罕见并发症;它在复杂 CTO 中更为常见,与技术成功率较低和更高的 MACE 相关。

相似文献

1
Equipment entrapment/loss during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.器械嵌顿/丢失于慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Apr;36(4). doi: 10.25270/jic/23.00266.
2
Geographic diversity in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的地域差异:来自 PROGRESS-CTO 注册研究的见解。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Sep;36(9). doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00056.
3
Impact of calcium on the procedural techniques and outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.钙对慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的程序技术和结果的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;390:131254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131254. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Lesion characteristics and procedural outcomes of re-attempted percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion.慢性完全闭塞病变再次尝试经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的病变特征及手术结果
Heart Vessels. 2018 Jun;33(6):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1091-3. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Use of the Carlino Technique in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.卡洛尼技术在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 15;207:305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.155. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Incidence, Mechanisms, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中冠状动脉穿孔的发生率、机制、治疗和转归。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;182:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变患者中既往冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;205:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.112. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
8
Impact of lesion length on the outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.病变长度对慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响:来自PROGRESS-CTO注册研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):747-755. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30581. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
9
Primary vs Secondary Retrograde Approach in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉介入治疗中初次与二次逆行入路的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Sep;34(9):E672-E677. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00059. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
10
A Systematic Review of Periprocedural Risk Prediction Scores in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期风险预测评分的系统评价
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;193:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of an entrapped guidewire by excimer laser coronary angioplasty in patients with chronic total occlusion intervention.采用准分子激光冠状动脉成形术移除慢性完全闭塞病变介入患者体内的嵌顿导丝。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04440-7.