• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩张器置入后血肿预测模型:20 年来 7080 例回顾性队列研究。

Prediction model for haematoma after tissue expander placement: A retrospective cohort study of 7080 cases over 20 years.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.050. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.050
PMID:38412602
Abstract

Haematoma is an early complication of tissue expander placement and can lead to infection, capsule contracture and various complications, hindering successful reconstruction. However, no scientific models can accurately predict the risk of haematoma following tissue expansion. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for haematoma following tissue expander placement. The medical records of patients who underwent expander placement between 2001 and 2021 were obtained from the clinical database of the Department of Plastic Surgery at the Xijing Hospital. A total of 4579 consecutive patients with 7080 expanders and 179 expanded pocket haematomas were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified adult age (P = 0.006), male sex (P < 0.001), scar reconstruction (P = 0.019), perioperative hypertension (P < 0.001), face and neck location (P = 0.002) and activated partial thromboplastin time above the normal range (P < 0.001) as risk factors for haematoma. Therefore, these were included in the prediction model, and a nomogram was constructed. The discrimination of the nomogram was robust (area under the curve: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.83). Further, the prediction model had a strong fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.066) and maintained similar discrimination after considering performance optimism (bootstrapped area under the curve: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.84). This clinical prediction model was created using a generalisable dataset and can be utilised to obtain valid haematoma predictions after expander placement, assisting surgeons in implementing preventive measures or interventions to reduce the occurrence of haematoma.

摘要

血肿是组织扩张器放置的早期并发症,可导致感染、包膜挛缩和各种并发症,从而阻碍成功的重建。然而,目前尚无科学模型可以准确预测组织扩张后血肿的风险。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证组织扩张器放置后血肿的预测模型。从西京医院整形外科临床数据库中获取了 2001 年至 2021 年期间接受扩张器放置的患者的病历。共分析了 4579 例连续患者的 7080 个扩张器和 179 个扩张袋血肿。多变量逻辑回归分析确定成人年龄(P=0.006)、男性(P<0.001)、瘢痕重建(P=0.019)、围手术期高血压(P<0.001)、面颈部位置(P=0.002)和活化部分凝血活酶时间高于正常范围(P<0.001)是血肿的危险因素。因此,这些因素被纳入预测模型,并构建了一个列线图。该列线图的判别能力较强(曲线下面积:0.78;95%置信区间:0.72-0.83)。此外,该预测模型拟合度较好(Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验,P=0.066),在考虑性能乐观性后,其判别能力保持不变(Bootstrapped 曲线下面积:0.79;95%置信区间:0.73-0.84)。该临床预测模型是使用可推广的数据集创建的,可以用于获得扩张器放置后血肿的有效预测,帮助外科医生采取预防措施或干预措施,减少血肿的发生。

相似文献

1
Prediction model for haematoma after tissue expander placement: A retrospective cohort study of 7080 cases over 20 years.扩张器置入后血肿预测模型:20 年来 7080 例回顾性队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.050. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
[Establishment and validation of a clinical prediction model for infection risk at the placement sites of skin and soft tissue expanders].[皮肤软组织扩张器置入部位感染风险临床预测模型的建立与验证]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 20;37(9):846-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200619-00314.
3
Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.胸大肌前与胸大肌下组织扩张器乳房重建:一项历史对照、倾向评分匹配的围手术期结局比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008013.
4
Pediatric Tissue Expansion: Predictors of Premature Expander Removal in a Single Surgeon's Experience with 472 Expanders.小儿组织扩张:单外科医生 472 例扩张器经验中预测过早移除扩张器的因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):755-762. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006550.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Neck Tissue Expander Placement in Reconstruction of Post-Burn Facial Scar Deformities.一项比较内镜辅助与开放式颈部组织扩张器植入用于烧伤后面部瘢痕畸形重建的随机对照试验。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;40(4):526-34. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0644-7. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
Risk Factors for Tissue Expander-Related Infections in Pediatric Scar Reconstruction: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.小儿瘢痕重建中组织扩张器相关感染的危险因素:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Dec 1;154(6):1200e-1208e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011390. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion.小儿组织扩张并发症危险因素的多变量分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 May 1;92(5):522-527. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003983.
8
Endoscopic versus open tissue-expander placement: is less invasive better?内镜下与开放式组织扩张器置入:侵入性较小是否更好?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):894-906. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252310.87638.ae.
9
Use of scar and capsule flap for preventing the contour deformity after applying tissue expansion in patients with scar.瘢痕和包膜瓣在预防瘢痕患者组织扩张术后外形畸形中的应用。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):e151-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000412.
10
Two-stage expander implant reconstruction: recent experience.两阶段扩张器植入重建:近期经验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1429-1436. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818b89da.

引用本文的文献

1
Application and exploration of interprofessional education in the teaching of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a narrative review.整形与重建外科教学中跨专业教育的应用与探索:一项叙述性综述
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06423-w.