Suppr超能文献

择期小儿软性支气管镜检查的临床实用性及其对生活质量的影响:一项单中心、单盲、随机对照试验方案。

Clinical utility of elective paediatric flexible bronchoscopy and impact on the quality of life: protocol for a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Feb 26;11(1):e001704. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001704.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Elective flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is now widely available and standard practice for a variety of indications in children with respiratory conditions. However, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have examined its benefits (or otherwise).Our primary aim is to determine the impact of FB on the parent-proxy quality-of-life (QoL) scores. Our secondary aims are to determine if undertaking FB leads to (a) change in management and (b) improvement of other relevant patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We also quantified the benefits of elective FB (using 10-point Likert scale). We hypothesised that undertaking elective FB will contribute to accurate diagnosis and therefore appropriate treatment, which will in turn improve QoL and will be deemed to be beneficial from patient and doctor perspectives.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our parallel single-centre, single-blind RCT (commenced in May 2020) has a planned sample size of 114 children (aged <18 years) recruited from respiratory clinics at Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Children are randomised (1:1 concealed allocation) within two strata: age (≤2 vs >2 years) and indication for FB (chronic cough vs other indications) to either (a) early arm (intervention where FB undertaken within 2 weeks) or (b) delayed (control, FB undertaken at usual wait time). Our primary outcome is the difference between groups in their change in QoL at the T2 timepoint when the intervention group has had the FB and the control group has not. Our secondary outcomes are change in management, change in PROMs, adverse events and the Likert scales.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The human research ethics committee of the Queensland Children's Hospital granted ethical clearance (HREC/20/QCHQ/62394). Our RCT is conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Australian legislation. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations, teaching avenues, workshops, websites and publications.

REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12620000610932.

摘要

介绍

现在,在儿童呼吸系统疾病的各种适应证中,选择性软性支气管镜(FB)已广泛应用并成为标准治疗方法。然而,目前尚无随机对照试验(RCT)研究其获益(或无益)。我们的主要目的是确定 FB 对患儿家长代理者生活质量(QoL)评分的影响。次要目的是确定 FB 是否导致(a)治疗方法的改变和(b)其他相关患者报告结局测量(PROM)的改善。我们还量化了选择性 FB 的获益(采用 10 分 Likert 量表)。我们假设,开展选择性 FB 将有助于做出准确的诊断,从而进行适当的治疗,这反过来将提高 QoL,并将被认为对患儿和医生均有益。

方法和分析

我们的平行单中心、单盲 RCT (于 2020 年 5 月开始)计划招募 114 名来自澳大利亚布里斯班昆士兰儿童医院呼吸科的<18 岁患儿。患儿根据年龄(≤2 岁与>2 岁)和 FB 适应证(慢性咳嗽与其他适应证)分为两个层进行 1:1 隐匿性分配,分别进入早期组(干预组,FB 在 2 周内进行)或延迟组(对照组,FB 在常规等待时间进行)。我们的主要结局是干预组进行 FB 而对照组未进行 FB 时,两组在 T2 时间点 QoL 变化的差异。次要结局是治疗方法的改变、PROM 的改变、不良事件和 Likert 量表。

伦理与传播

昆士兰儿童医院的人体研究伦理委员会批准了该研究的伦理许可(HREC/20/QCHQ/62394)。本 RCT 遵循良好临床实践和澳大利亚法规进行。结果将通过会议报告、教学途径、研讨会、网站和出版物进行传播。

注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册 ACTRN12620000610932。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验