• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎体成形术或后凸成形术后夹心椎是否易再骨折?一项荟萃分析。

Are Sandwich Vertebrae Prone to Refracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty? A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Liu Xue-Yang, Feng Min, Zhang Xiang-Long, Zou Tao, Huang Zhi, Yang Jian-Dong, Sun Hui-Hui

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Day treatment ward, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):83-90. doi: 10.14444/8577.

DOI:10.14444/8577
PMID:38413236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11265482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The formation of sandwiched vertebrae (SDVs) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has become a common phenomenon. Whether SDVs are more likely to fracture is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to provide medical evidence for whether SDVs are more prone to refracture than non-SDVs (NSDVs) after PVP or PKP.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Weipu, were thoroughly searched for relevant studies included from any point up until June 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 4052 individuals from 9 studies were enrolled. Overall, patients with SDV presented more risk to have refracture than patients with NSDV (OR = 1.57, = 0.04). The incidences of refracture were comparable between the 2 cohorts in studies with a follow-up time less than 3 years (OR = 1.28, = 0.49). However, patients with SDV were more prone to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies with a follow-up time longer than 3 years (OR = 1.92, = 0.009). Moreover, patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture than patients with NSDV in studies that involved both PVP and PKP (OR = 1.62, = 0.002). In addition, age, low bone density, and postoperative kyphosis angle of sandwich fracture segments >10° were independent factors to predict refracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SDV were more likely to have refracture after PVP or PKP, especially when the follow-up time was longer than 3 years.

摘要

背景

经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或经皮后凸成形术(PKP)后夹心椎体(SDV)的形成已成为一种常见现象。SDV是否更容易骨折仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以提供医学证据,证明PVP或PKP后SDV是否比非SDV(NSDV)更容易再次骨折。

方法

本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目标准进行。全面检索了多个数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Medline数据库、中国知网、万方和维普,以查找截至2022年6月的任何相关研究。使用Revman 5.4进行统计分析。

结果

共纳入9项研究中的4052名个体。总体而言,SDV患者比NSDV患者发生再次骨折的风险更高(OR = 1.57,P = 0.04)。在随访时间少于3年的研究中,两组的骨折发生率相当(OR = 1.28,P = 0.49)。然而,在随访时间超过3年的研究中,SDV患者比NSDV患者更容易发生再次骨折(OR = 1.92,P = 0.009)。此外,在涉及PVP和PKP的研究中,SDV患者比NSDV患者更有可能发生再次骨折(OR = 1.62,P = 0.002)。此外,年龄、低骨密度以及夹心骨折节段的术后后凸角度>10°是预测再次骨折的独立因素。

结论

PVP或PKP后,SDV患者更有可能发生再次骨折,尤其是随访时间超过3年时。

相似文献

1
Are Sandwich Vertebrae Prone to Refracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty? A Meta-Analysis.经皮椎体成形术或后凸成形术后夹心椎是否易再骨折?一项荟萃分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):83-90. doi: 10.14444/8577.
2
Risk factor analysis for re-collapse of cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或经皮后凸成形术(PKP)后骨水泥强化椎体再塌陷的危险因素分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Sep;42(9):2131-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3838-6. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
3
Risk factors of vertebral re-fracture after PVP or PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, especially in Eastern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎体后凸成形术(PVP)或经皮椎体成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后椎体再骨折的风险因素,特别是在东亚:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03038-z.
4
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic Kümmell's disease:a prospective cohort study.经皮椎体成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性 Kümmell 病的临床疗效比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 13;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03271-9.
5
Comparison of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Single Level Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.经皮椎体成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗单节段椎体压缩骨折的比较:文献的Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):209-22.
6
Comparison of Outcomes Between Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Kümmell's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗 Kümmell 病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Jul 1;35(6):276-286. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001269. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
[Influence on adjacent lumbar bone density after strengthening of T12, L1 segment vertebral osteoporotic compression fracture by percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty].经皮椎体成形术和经皮后凸成形术强化T12、L1节段椎体骨质疏松性压缩骨折对相邻腰椎骨密度的影响
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;27(7):819-23.
8
Recompression in new levels after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty compared with conservative treatment.经皮椎体成形术和后凸成形术后在新节段再压缩与保守治疗的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jan;134(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1886-3. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
9
The risk factors of vertebral refracture after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a study protocol for a prospective cohort study.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者椎体后凸成形术后椎体再骨折的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究的研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 2;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2123-6.
10
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND PERCUTANEOUS KYPHOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE WITH INTRAVERTEBRAL VACUUM CLEFT].经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗伴椎体内真空裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160225.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram for predicting fracture of the sandwich vertebrae after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a multicenter study with 1-year follow-up.预测经皮椎体强化术后夹心椎体骨折的列线图:一项为期1年随访的多中心研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08896-9.
2
Hollow Screw Placement Combined with Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Serves as a Valuable Three-Column Intensive Treatment for Patients with Kummell's Disease and Pedicle Rupture.空心螺钉置入联合经皮椎体成形术是治疗Kummell病合并椎弓根破裂患者的一种有价值的三柱强化治疗方法。
J Pain Res. 2024 Aug 26;17:2767-2774. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S469755. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture higher than that of ordinary adjacent vertebral fracture after PKP?PKP 后 sandwich 椎体骨折的发生率是否高于普通相邻椎体骨折?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29900. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029900.
2
Risk factors of vertebral re-fracture after PVP or PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, especially in Eastern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎体后凸成形术(PVP)或经皮椎体成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后椎体再骨折的风险因素,特别是在东亚:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03038-z.
3
Do sandwich vertebral bodies increase the risk of post-augmentation fractures? A retrospective cohort study.夹心椎体是否会增加骨水泥强化治疗后骨折的风险?一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Dec 1;16(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00922-9.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球 204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年骨折负担的全球、区域和国家分析:来自 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Sep;2(9):e580-e592. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0.
5
[Comparison of refracture risk between sandwich vertebrae and ordinary adjacent vertebrae].[夹心椎骨与普通相邻椎骨再骨折风险的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 15;35(9):1161-1166. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202104060.
6
Fracture-free probability and predictors of new symptomatic fractures in sandwich, ordinary-adjacent, and non-adjacent vertebrae: a vertebra-specific survival analysis.无骨折生存率及夹心椎体、普通相邻椎体和非相邻椎体新发症状性骨折的预测因素:椎体特异性生存分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Nov;13(11):1058-1062. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016985. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Advances in Vertebral Augmentation Systems for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体增强系统的研究进展。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Dec 7;2020:3947368. doi: 10.1155/2020/3947368. eCollection 2020.
8
Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.骨质疏松性椎体骨折的治疗。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102779. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102779. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
A Retrospective Analysis in 1347 Patients Undergoing Cement Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: Is the Sandwich Vertebra at a Higher Risk of Further Fracture?1347例接受骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折骨水泥强化治疗患者的回顾性分析:夹心椎发生进一步骨折的风险更高吗?
Neurosurgery. 2021 Jan 13;88(2):342-348. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa435.
10
Vertebral compression fractures: Still an unpredictable aspect of osteoporosis.椎体压缩性骨折:骨质疏松症仍不可预测的一个方面。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Apr 30;51(2):393-399. doi: 10.3906/sag-2005-315.