Suppr超能文献

[德国的学术护理教育:正式结构中的异同]

[Academic nursing education in Germany: Similarities and differences in formal structure].

作者信息

Knapp Kai, Darmann-Finck Ingrid

机构信息

Universität Bremen, Uni Bremen Campus GmbH, Zentrum für Pflege und Bildung, Bremen, Deutschland.

Universität Bremen, Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung (IPP), Bremen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Apr;185:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The German Nursing Professions Act establishes a primary qualifying course of studies at universities, which is completed with a bachelor's degree and a vocational qualification as a nurse. The Nursing Professions Act and the Nursing Training and Examination Ordinance open up some possibilities with regard to the study program concept. The present paper examines the question of how the degree programs are formally structured.

METHODOLOGY

A document analysis of the curricula or module manuals of the degree programs existing in December 2022 was conducted, which ultimately included 26 degree programs in the analysis. The module handbooks were analyzed and compared in terms of content using an inductively developed analysis grid.

RESULTS

There are considerable differences between the programs in terms of total duration/total workload, length and rhythm of practical study phase, composition of workload of practical study phase, as well as the extent of university study and the ratio of classroom to self-study.

DISCUSSION

Due to the high number of validations (20 from 26), the results are meaningful. The findings suggest that it is often less content-related than pragmatic reasons or external constraints that guide the design of the degree programs. From a vocational education and training perspective, too few alternations between practical and academic study phases or very extensive self-study phases could be disadvantageous for the students' acquisition of competencies.

摘要

背景

德国《护理职业法》规定了大学的主要资格课程,该课程以护理学学士学位和职业资格结束。《护理职业法》和《护理培训与考试条例》在学习计划概念方面提供了一些可能性。本文探讨学位课程在形式上是如何构建的问题。

方法

对2022年12月现有的学位课程的课程大纲或模块手册进行了文献分析,最终分析中纳入了26个学位课程。使用归纳开发的分析框架对模块手册进行了内容分析和比较。

结果

各课程在总时长/总工作量、实践学习阶段的长度和节奏、实践学习阶段工作量的构成、大学学习的程度以及课堂学习与自主学习的比例方面存在显著差异。

讨论

由于有效验证的数量较多(26个中有20个),结果具有意义。研究结果表明,指导学位课程设计的往往更多是务实原因或外部限制,而非与内容相关的因素。从职业教育培训的角度来看,实践学习阶段和学术学习阶段之间的交替过少或自主学习阶段过长,可能对学生能力的培养不利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验