Albrecht Joanna, Maaß Laura, Tokgöz Pinar, Hrynyschyn Robert, Wrona Kamil J, Stark Anna Lea, Dunsche Celina, Fischer Florian, Schmidt Annalena, Schulz Henriette, Hidding Sarah, Dockweiler Christoph
Universität Siegen, Lebenswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Department Digitale Gesundheitswissenschaften und Biomedizin, Professur für Digital Public Health, Siegen, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Public Health e.V., Fachbereich Digital Public Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):339-350. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03844-2. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
BACKGROUND: Professionals, especially in the field of digital public health (DiPH), are crucial for a successful digital transformation in social and health care. However, it is still unclear to what extent academic professionals are taught DiPH-related content in their public health (PH) studies. METHODS: This study used a systematic module handbook analysis to analyze accredited full-time PH-oriented degree programs at public colleges and universities in Germany for DiPH-related module content. Through the "Hochschulkompass" platform and the member programs of the German Public Health Association (DGPH), 422 programs were identified. Included module handbooks were evaluated by content analysis using MAXQDA. RESULTS: Only 10 bachelor and 6 master programs contain DiPH. They are heterogeneous in their focus and belong to different subfields of public health ("methods, definition, history, and social medicine" = 5; "health management" = 5; "digital health" = 3; "health services research" = 2; "health communication" = 1). Differences were found between the common understanding of DiPH in academia and the content in the module handbooks. The content identified in the analysis focuses mainly on technical areas. Social and health science content is only marginally present. DISCUSSION: The heterogeneous study programs with a connection to DiPH allow academic PH specialists to develop specific profiles. To achieve comprehensive competencies in DiPH, there is a need for further development of modules with relevance to the respective degree program. The results could be used for the (further) development of relevant modules and a core curriculum in DiPH.
背景:专业人员,尤其是数字公共卫生(DiPH)领域的专业人员,对于社会和医疗保健领域成功的数字化转型至关重要。然而,学术专业人员在其公共卫生(PH)研究中接受DiPH相关内容教学的程度仍不明确。 方法:本研究采用系统的模块手册分析方法,对德国公立高校认可的全日制公共卫生相关学位课程中的DiPH相关模块内容进行分析。通过 “高校罗盘” 平台和德国公共卫生协会(DGPH)的会员项目,共识别出422个项目。使用MAXQDA通过内容分析对纳入的模块手册进行评估。 结果:只有10个本科项目和6个硕士项目包含DiPH内容。它们的重点各不相同,属于公共卫生的不同子领域(“方法、定义、历史和社会医学” = 5;“健康管理” = 5;“数字健康” = 3;“卫生服务研究” = 2;“健康传播” = 1)。学术界对DiPH的普遍理解与模块手册中的内容存在差异。分析中确定的内容主要集中在技术领域。社会和健康科学内容仅占很少一部分。 讨论:与DiPH相关的多样化研究项目使公共卫生学术专家能够形成特定的专业形象。为了在DiPH方面获得全面的能力,需要进一步开发与各自学位项目相关的模块。研究结果可用于DiPH相关模块和核心课程的(进一步)开发。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024-3
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024-4
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10
Front Public Health. 2017-6-23
Rev Med Chil. 2021-8
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019-1-28
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025-2
BMC Oral Health. 2022-12-1
J Med Internet Res. 2022-11-29
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022-3
Hum Resour Health. 2021-4-14
J Med Internet Res. 2020-11-5
Ann Glob Health. 2020-10-8
Int J Med Inform. 2020-8-27