Martínez-Meñaca Amaya, Cruz-Utrilla Alejandro, Mora-Cuesta Víctor Manuel, Luna-López Raquel, Segura-de la Cal Teresa, Flox-Camacho Ángela, Alonso-Lecue Pilar, Escribano-Subias Pilar, Cifrián-Martínez José Manuel
Respiratory Department, ERN-LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Santander Spain.
Cardiology Department, ERN-LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid Spain.
Pulm Circ. 2024 Feb 27;14(1):e12342. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12342. eCollection 2024 Jan.
A simplified 4-strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow-up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6-min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 0 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on risk stratification by this scale. We included 180 prevalent patients with PAH from two reference hospitals in Spain, followed up between 2006 and 2022. Patients were included if all the variables of interest were available within a 3-month period on the Spanish Registry of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (REHAP): functional class (FC); NT-proBNP; 6MWT; and CPET. The original 4-strata model (NT-proBNP, 6MWT, FC) identified most patients at low or intermediate-low risk (36.7% and 51.1%, respectively). Notably, the modified scale (NT-proBNP, CPET, FC) improved the identification of patients at intermediate-high risk up to 18.9%, and at high risk up to 1.1% in comparison with the previous 12.2% and 0.0% in the original scale. This new model increased the number of patients correctly classified into higher-risk strata (positive NRI of 0.06), as well as classified more patients without events in lower-risk strata (negative NRI of 0.04). The proposed score showed a slightly superior prognostic capacity compared with the original model (Harrel's C-index 0.717 vs. 0.709). Using O uptake instead of distance walked in the 6MWT improves the identification of high-risk patients using the 4-strata scale. This change could have relevant prognostic implications and lead to changes in the specific treatment of PAH.
一种基于三个变量的简化四层风险分层方法在肺动脉高压(PAH)随访中广泛应用。本研究旨在评估用心肺运动试验(CPET)评估的峰值摄氧量取代6分钟步行试验(6MWT)对该量表风险分层的影响。我们纳入了西班牙两家参考医院的180例PAH现患患者,随访时间为2006年至2022年。如果西班牙肺动脉高压注册登记处(REHAP)在3个月内可获取所有感兴趣的变量,即功能分级(FC)、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)、6MWT和CPET,则将患者纳入研究。原始的四层模型(NT-proBNP、6MWT、FC)将大多数患者识别为低风险或中低风险(分别为36.7%和51.1%)。值得注意的是,与原始量表中之前的12.2%和0.0%相比,改良后的量表(NT-proBNP、CPET、FC)将中高风险患者的识别率提高到18.9%,高风险患者的识别率提高到1.1%。这个新模型增加了正确分类到更高风险层患者数量(净重新分类指数为0.06),同时也将更多无事件发生的患者分类到更低风险层(净重新分类指数为0.04)。与原始模型相比,所提出的评分显示出略优的预后能力(Harrel's C指数分别为0.717和0.709)。在四层量表中,用摄氧量取代6MWT中的步行距离可改善对高风险患者的识别。这一变化可能具有相关的预后意义,并导致PAH具体治疗的改变。