Department of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Quality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):689-697. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.2.689.
This project aimed to mitigate the risk of falls among oncology patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in the outpatient setting.
Methods: The project was conducted within outpatient settings, specifically encompassing outpatient clinics, daycare, radiology and radiotherapy, and rehabilitation at the SQCCCRC. The project employed an observational analytical design to assess the fall risk assessment procedure in outpatient settings. The project integrated a 7-step procedure for conducting an FMEA methodology, including defining the system or process, identifying potential failure mode, evaluating the effects of each failure mode, Assigning severity, likelihood, and detection of occurrence ratings, and identifying and implement corrective actions. In addition, Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) were used to identify the impact of the interventions in reducing the risk of patient fall assessment and management.
Result: In the patient fall screening process, interventions yielded substantial reductions in RPNs for failure modes like "Wrong assessment" (57% decrease) and "Complex risk assessment scale" (63% decrease), addressing knowledge gaps and simplifying risk assessment. Similarly, the "Missed fall assessment" failure mode saw an impressive 80% reduction in RPN, rectifying unclear processes and knowledge gaps. In the Fall risk precaution measures process, interventions led to noteworthy RPN reductions, such as 80% for "Unclear fall precaution measures-responsibilities" and 57% for "Missed bracelets for high risk," demonstrating successful risk mitigation. Moreover, interventions in the Patient Education process achieved significant RPN reductions (57% and 55%) for "No/improper education" and "Unuse of educational material and resources," enhancing staff education and patient awareness. The total reduction in RPNs was 62% in all failure modes in the fall assessment and management process.
Conclusion: Overall, FMEA is a valuable strategy for reducing fall risks among oncology patients, but its success depends on addressing these limitations and ensuring the thorough execution and maintenance of the identified corrective actions.
本项目旨在通过失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)降低肿瘤患者在门诊环境中的跌倒风险。
方法:该项目在门诊环境中进行,具体涵盖门诊诊所、日间护理、放射科和放疗以及 SQCCCRC 的康复科。该项目采用观察性分析设计评估门诊环境中的跌倒风险评估程序。项目整合了执行 FMEA 方法的 7 个步骤,包括定义系统或流程、识别潜在失效模式、评估每个失效模式的影响、分配严重程度、发生可能性和检测程度评分、识别和实施纠正措施。此外,风险优先数(RPN)用于识别干预措施对降低患者跌倒评估和管理风险的影响。
结果:在患者跌倒筛查过程中,干预措施显著降低了“错误评估”(降低 57%)和“复杂风险评估量表”(降低 63%)等失效模式的 RPN,解决了知识差距并简化了风险评估。同样,“漏评跌倒”失效模式的 RPN 降低了 80%,纠正了流程和知识差距不明确的问题。在跌倒风险预防措施过程中,干预措施导致 RPN 显著降低,例如“预防措施不明确-职责”降低 80%,“高风险未戴腕带”降低 57%,表明风险得到有效缓解。此外,患者教育过程中的干预措施也显著降低了 RPN(分别为 57%和 55%),如“无/不当教育”和“未使用教育材料和资源”,提高了员工教育和患者意识。所有跌倒评估和管理过程中的失效模式的 RPN 总降低率为 62%。
结论:总体而言,FMEA 是降低肿瘤患者跌倒风险的有效策略,但要取得成功,还需要解决这些局限性,并确保彻底执行和维护所确定的纠正措施。