Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Apr 2;12(4):e0277623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02776-23. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131- (KPC-ST131-) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49- isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MIC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31- resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MIC > 16/4 mg/L, MIC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1- high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131- isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MIC > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MIC ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MIC ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131- isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.
头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔在产 KPC 的肠杆菌科细菌感染的为数不多的替代药物中占有重要地位。我们报告了产 KPC-ST131(KPC-ST131-)临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔的耐药性的出现。进行了抗菌药物敏感性试验、傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱、全基因组测序和克隆实验。从一名在重症监护病房住院的肿瘤科患者的血液样本中分离出对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(MIC > 16/4 mg/L)耐药但对头孢地尔敏感(MIC:2 mg/L)的 KPC-49 分离株。在第二次头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗周期中,在直肠样本中发现了对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔均耐药的 KPC-31(MIC > 16/4 mg/L,MIC:8 mg/L)。在流行的 ST131-H30R1-高风险克隆中检测到 KPC-49(R163S)和 KPC-31(D179Y),并表现出类似于 ESBL 产生菌的表型。FTIR 光谱能够区分头孢地尔敏感和耐药的 ST131 分离株,以及来自其他不同克隆的分离株。经过克隆和转化实验,KPC-49 和 KPC-31 导致头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药(MIC > 16/4 mg/L)和碳青霉烯类 MIC 降低(MIC ≤ 0.12 mg/L,MIC ≤ 1 mg/L)。还表明 KPC-31 与头孢地尔 MIC 升高(分别为 KPC-3 和 KPC-49 的两倍和三倍稀释度)有关。然而,参与外膜稳定性和完整性的蛋白质(如 TolR)中的突变可能在头孢地尔耐药中发挥更重要的作用。产 KPC 突变的肠杆菌科临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔的共同耐药性,使临床实验室难以识别这些耐药性。
重要性
在我们医院的一名患者的四次住院期间,在监测和临床 ST131 分离株中发现了不同的 KPC-3 变体(KPC-3、KPC-49 和 KPC-31),这些变体是在使用美罗培南和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦进行长时间治疗后产生的。对头孢地尔和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的耐药模式不同,同时伴有碳青霉烯类药物敏感性恢复。一些表型方法,特别是免疫层析法检测不出这些变体,而且表现出类似于 ESBL 产生菌的表型,这给临床微生物学实验室鉴定这些变体带来了挑战。分子方法和全基因组测序是必要的,能够聚类或区分相关分离株的新技术也可能会有帮助;傅里叶变换红外光谱就是这种情况,在我们的研究中,它成功地在 ST131 内区分了头孢地尔敏感的分离株,以及非 ST131 的分离株。