• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有内部锥形连接和微螺纹的种植体系统的旋转负载疲劳性能。

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of an Implant System with an Internal Conical Connection and Microthreads.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Feb 27;39(1):119-126. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10341.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.10341
PMID:38416005
Abstract

PURPOSE

This in vitro study investigated the effect of implant geometry and diameter on the rotational load fatigue performance of an implant system with an internal conical connection with microthreads.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Regular (4.2 mm) and wide-diameter (4.8 mm) Astra Tech EV implants with straight (S) and conical (C) geometries were tested with their corresponding titanium abutments, comprising four test groups: 4.2-mm S (Group 1), 4.2-mm C (Group 2), 4.8-mm S (Group 3), and 4.8-mm C (Group 4). Five samples were included in each group. Customized brass implant holders and abutment holders were machined. A rotational load fatigue machine was used to apply a sinusoidally varying load to the implant-abutment interface at an angle of 45 degrees to produce an effective bending moment of 35 Ncm at a frequency of 14 Hz (air temperature: 20°C). The number of cycles to failure was recorded, with the upper limit set at 5 × 106 cycles. Results were analyzed using ANOVA. Failed samples were examined with a scanning electron microscope to evaluate the mode of failure.

RESULTS

Of the 20 total samples, 2 failed, with Groups 1 and 2 each reporting one failure. Abutment and abutment screw fracture were observed in the failed sample in Group 1, while implant and abutment screw fracture occurred in the failed sample in Group 2. All wide-diameter implants ran beyond the cut-off without failure, but abutment screw loosening was noted in one sample in Group 3. No significant difference was found between implant groups of different geometries and diameters. Damage to the abutments and the implant internal surface were noted in all failed samples.

CONCLUSIONS

While no significant differences were found between the test groups, failures were observed only in the regular-diameter group. The abutment and abutment screw fractured deep within the implant, and the implant fractured below the simulated bone level. These modes of failure may pose a significant clinical challenge during retrieval of these components.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在探讨具有内锥形连接和微螺纹的种植体系统中,种植体几何形状和直径对旋转负载疲劳性能的影响。

材料和方法

使用直(S)和锥形(C)几何形状的常规(4.2mm)和宽直径(4.8mm)AstraTech EV 种植体及其相应的钛基台进行测试,包括四个测试组:4.2mm S(第 1 组)、4.2mm C(第 2 组)、4.8mm S(第 3 组)和 4.8mm C(第 4 组)。每组包含 5 个样本。定制的黄铜种植体保持器和基台保持器被加工。使用旋转负载疲劳机以 45 度角向种植体-基台界面施加正弦变化的负载,以产生 35Ncm 的有效弯曲力矩,频率为 14Hz(空气温度:20°C)。记录失效的循环次数,上限设置为 5×106 次循环。使用 ANOVA 进行结果分析。使用扫描电子显微镜检查失效样本,以评估失效模式。

结果

在总共 20 个样本中,有 2 个样本失效,第 1 组和第 2 组各报告 1 个失效。在第 1 组失效样本中观察到基台和基台螺钉断裂,而在第 2 组失效样本中观察到种植体和基台螺钉断裂。所有宽直径种植体均在截止点之前运行而未失效,但在第 3 组的一个样本中观察到基台螺钉松动。不同几何形状和直径的种植体组之间没有发现显著差异。所有失效样本均观察到基台和种植体内部表面损坏。

结论

虽然测试组之间没有发现显著差异,但仅在常规直径组中观察到失效。基台和基台螺钉在种植体内部深处断裂,种植体在模拟骨水平以下断裂。这些失效模式可能在这些部件的取出过程中带来重大临床挑战。

相似文献

1
Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of an Implant System with an Internal Conical Connection and Microthreads.具有内部锥形连接和微螺纹的种植体系统的旋转负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Feb 27;39(1):119-126. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10341.
2
Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.钛与钛锆种植体-基台连接的旋转负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):740-747. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9260.
3
Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.锥形种植体-基台连接的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):797-806.
4
Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of a One-Size Implant- Abutment Connection System.一种单一尺寸种植体-基台连接系统的旋转负载疲劳性能
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Dec 11;39(6):223-233. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10907.
5
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
6
Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.单牙种植基台系统的负载疲劳性能:直径的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):929-36.
7
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.四种种植体-基台界面设计的负载疲劳性能:扭矩水平和种植系统的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):253-62.
9
Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.五种具有不同内部连接的种植体系统上基台的旋转自由度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.