• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种具有不同内部连接的种植体系统上基台的旋转自由度。

Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.

作者信息

Bédouin Yvan, Lefrançois Etienne, Salomon Jean-Pierre, Auroy Pascal

机构信息

Associate Professor, CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, INSA Rennes, CNRS, ISCR (Rennes Institute of Chemical Sciences), Rennes, France.

Assistant Professor, CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, INSA Rennes, CNRS, ISCR (Rennes Institute of Chemical Sciences), Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027
PMID:34238536
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Information regarding the rotational freedom of internal connection implants is sparse.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the rotational freedom of different internal conical and internal nonconical connections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty implants, 30 straight manufactured standard abutments, and 30 standard abutment screws were obtained for each of the 5 implant systems tested. Three implant systems had indexed internal conical connections with different antirotational geometries: hexagon (Naturall+), cam-groove (ID CAM M), and octagon (Bone Level). Two implant systems had internal nonconical connections with hexagonal antirotational geometry (Tapered Screw-Vent and Seven). The implants were mounted in a steel plate, and a metal reference arm was attached to the abutment. Before tightening the standard abutment screw, a modified torque wrench was used to rotate the abutment clockwise until reaching the clockwise rotational endpoint. This modified torque wrench was connected to the abutment's outer surface. It allowed free access to the standard abutment screw for a second torque wrench, specific to each implant system. The modified torque wrench applied a controlled torque of 5 Ncm, which held the abutment at the clockwise rotational endpoint. The standard abutment screw was then tightened to the manufacturer's specified torque value with the second torque wrench. Angle value corresponding to the clockwise endpoint was measured microscopically between a fixed reference point on the steel plate and the reference arm. The abutment was then unscrewed and removed. The same procedure was carried out to rotate the abutment counterclockwise and measure the angle value corresponding to the counterclockwise rotational endpoint. The rotational freedom was finally determined from the differences in the angles between the clockwise and counterclockwise rotational endpoints. Rotational freedom angle values were summarized as descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations). The normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) was applied, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to isolate the implant system differences from each other (α=.05).

RESULTS

The lowest mean rotational freedom angles were obtained for Bone Level (conical connection, 0.17 degrees) and Tapered Screw-Vent (nonconical connection, 0.05 degrees). These systems were followed in increasing order by ID CAM M (conical connection, 0.50 degrees), Seven (nonconical connection, 1.98 degrees), and Naturall+ (conical connection, 2.49 degrees). Compared with each other, all implant systems had significant statistical differences in rotational freedom angles (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences were found among the 5 implant systems. The lowest mean rotational freedom angles were obtained both with a conical connection (Bone Level) and a nonconical connection (Tapered Screw-Vent).

摘要

问题陈述

关于内部连接种植体旋转自由度的信息较少。

目的

本体外研究的目的是比较不同内部锥形和非锥形连接的旋转自由度。

材料与方法

对测试的5种植体系统,每种均获取30颗种植体、30个直的标准基台以及30个标准基台螺丝。3种植体系统具有带不同抗旋转几何形状的索引式内部锥形连接:六边形(Naturall+)、凸轮槽(ID CAM M)和八边形(骨水平型)。2种植体系统具有带六边形抗旋转几何形状的内部非锥形连接(锥形螺纹孔和Seven)。将种植体安装在钢板上,并在基台上连接一个金属参考臂。在拧紧标准基台螺丝之前,使用改良扭矩扳手顺时针旋转基台,直至到达顺时针旋转终点。该改良扭矩扳手连接到基台的外表面。它允许另一个特定于每种种植体系统的扭矩扳手自由接近标准基台螺丝。改良扭矩扳手施加5 Ncm的受控扭矩,将基台保持在顺时针旋转终点。然后用第二个扭矩扳手将标准基台螺丝拧紧至制造商规定的扭矩值。在钢板上的固定参考点与参考臂之间,通过显微镜测量对应于顺时针终点的角度值。然后拧松并移除基台。以相同程序逆时针旋转基台并测量对应于逆时针旋转终点的角度值。最终根据顺时针和逆时针旋转终点之间的角度差确定旋转自由度。旋转自由度角度值汇总为描述性统计量(均值、标准差)。应用正态性检验(柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验),并进行克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验。使用威尔科克森符号秩检验来区分各种植体系统之间的差异(α = 0.05)。

结果

骨水平型(锥形连接,0.17度)和锥形螺纹孔(非锥形连接,0.05度)获得的平均旋转自由度角度最低。按升序排列,这些系统之后依次是ID CAM M(锥形连接,0.50度)、Seven(非锥形连接,1.98度)和Naturall+(锥形连接,2.49度)。相互比较时,所有种植体系统在旋转自由度角度上均有显著统计学差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

在5种植体系统之间发现了显著差异。锥形连接(骨水平型)和非锥形连接(锥形螺纹孔)均获得了最低的平均旋转自由度角度。

相似文献

1
Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.五种具有不同内部连接的种植体系统上基台的旋转自由度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
2
Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.不同内连接的细径种植体基台的位移和性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Influence of abutment angulation on loss of prosthetic abutment torque under mechanical cycling.在机械循环中,基台角度对修复体基台扭矩损失的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):349.e1-349.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
4
Effects of Screw Configuration on the Preload Force of Implant-Abutment Screws.螺钉构型对种植体-基台螺钉预紧力的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):e25-e32. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5837.
5
Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.CAD-CAM 钛和氧化锆基台在不同种植体上的螺钉稳定性:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/cid.13001. Epub 2021 May 2.
6
Effect of Abutment Screw Design and Crown/Implant Ratio on Preload Maintenance of Single-Crown Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.基台螺钉设计和冠/种植体比值对单冠螺钉固位种植体支持修复体初始稳定性维持的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1397-1403. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7311.
7
The Influence of a Positioning Hex on Abutment Rotation in Tapered Internal Implants: A 3D Finite Element Model Study.定位Hex 对锥形内种植体基台旋转的影响:三维有限元模型研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):281-288. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7673.
8
Effects of cyclic loading on loss of abutment screw torque of angled screw channel single implant crowns on narrow diameter implants.循环加载对窄直径种植体上带角度螺丝通道的单颗种植体牙冠基台螺丝扭矩丧失的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):741.e1-741.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
9
Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences.随时间和拧紧/拧松顺序变化的螺钉连接种植体中预载的丧失。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):89-96. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3344.
10
Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.拧紧扭矩对螺钉应力和种植体-基台微间隙形成的影响:有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):882-889. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.026. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Optical measurement methods of the 3D-position stability of implant-abutment connections - an in vitro study.种植体-基台连接三维位置稳定性的光学测量方法——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06265-y.
2
Abutment connection structural changes in dual-retained and screw-retained metal-ceramic implant-supported restorations: an in vitro study, part I.双固位和螺丝固位金属陶瓷种植体支持修复体的基台连接结构变化:一项体外研究,第一部分
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06058-3.