Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 May;56(5):276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
To examine whether eating behavior and perceived stress predict the maintenance of self-reported dietary change and adherence to dietary instructions during an intervention.
A secondary analysis of the behavior maintenance stage (6-36 months) of the 3-year PREVIEW intervention (PREVention of diabetes through lifestyle Intervention and population studies in Europe and around the World).
Adults (n = 1,311) with overweight and prediabetes at preintervention baseline.
Eating behavior (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire), stress (Perceived Stress Scale), and dietary intake (4-day food records on 4 occasions) were reported.
Associations between predictors and dietary outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements.
Eating behaviors and stress at 6 months did not predict the subsequent change in dietary outcomes, but higher cognitive restraint predicted lower energy intake, and both higher disinhibition and hunger predicted higher energy intake during the following behavior maintenance stage. In addition, higher disinhibition predicted higher saturated fat intake and lower fiber intake, and higher hunger predicted lower fiber intake. Stress was not associated with energy intake or dietary quality. Eating behaviors and stress were not consistently associated with adherence to dietary instructions.
Higher cognitive restraint predicted lower energy intake (food quantity), but disinhibition and hunger were also associated with dietary quality.
研究饮食行为和感知压力是否能预测干预过程中自我报告的饮食变化的维持和饮食指导的依从性。
对为期 3 年的 PREVIEW 干预(通过生活方式干预和欧洲及世界各地的人群研究预防糖尿病)的行为维持阶段(6-36 个月)进行二次分析。
干预前基线时超重和糖尿病前期的成年人(n=1311)。
饮食行为(三因素饮食问卷)、压力(感知压力量表)和饮食摄入量(4 次 4 天的食物记录)。
采用线性混合效应模型对重复测量进行分析,以研究预测因子与饮食结果之间的关系。
6 个月时的饮食行为和压力并不能预测随后的饮食结果变化,但较高的认知约束预示着较低的能量摄入,较高的冲动性和饥饿感预示着在随后的行为维持阶段能量摄入较高。此外,较高的冲动性预示着较高的饱和脂肪摄入量和较低的纤维摄入量,较高的饥饿感预示着较低的纤维摄入量。压力与能量摄入或饮食质量无关。饮食行为和压力与饮食指导的依从性并不始终相关。
较高的认知约束预示着较低的能量摄入(食物数量),但冲动性和饥饿感也与饮食质量有关。