• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习算法的地震地面运动显著持时预测。

Significant duration prediction of seismic ground motions using machine learning algorithms.

机构信息

College of Civil Engineering, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116600, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0299639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299639. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0299639
PMID:38416770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10901361/
Abstract

This study aims to predict the significant duration (D5-75, D5-95) of seismic motion by employing machine learning algorithms. Based on three parameters (moment magnitude, fault distance, and average shear wave velocity), two additional parameters(fault top depth and epicenter mechanism parameters) were introduced in this study. The XGBoost algorithm is utilized for characteristic parameter optimization analysis to obtain the optimal combination of four parameters. We compare the prediction results of four machine learning algorithms (random forest, XGBoost, BP neural network, and SVM) and develop a new method of significant duration prediction by constructing two fusion models (stacking and weighted averaging). The fusion model demonstrates an improvement in prediction accuracy and generalization ability of the significant duration when compared to single algorithm models based on evaluation indicators and residual values. The accuracy and rationality of the fusion model are validated through comparison with existing research.

摘要

本研究旨在通过机器学习算法预测地震动的显著持续时间(D5-75、D5-95)。基于三个参数(矩震级、断层距离和平均剪切波速度),本研究引入了另外两个参数(断层顶深和震源机制参数)。XGBoost 算法用于特征参数优化分析,以获得四个参数的最优组合。我们比较了四种机器学习算法(随机森林、XGBoost、BP 神经网络和 SVM)的预测结果,并通过构建两个融合模型(堆叠和加权平均)开发了一种新的显著持续时间预测方法。基于评价指标和残差,融合模型在显著持续时间的预测精度和泛化能力方面优于单一算法模型。通过与现有研究的比较,验证了融合模型的准确性和合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/a615f19ea7e0/pone.0299639.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1d037ec56632/pone.0299639.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/65bd666f927d/pone.0299639.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f17fcfbaca80/pone.0299639.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/aacbd4b99a01/pone.0299639.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/6b4a0803475d/pone.0299639.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/97579c80d82c/pone.0299639.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/cb4cceaf3a9a/pone.0299639.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f9dc6ea9bf27/pone.0299639.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f79ecca97dda/pone.0299639.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/96bd849f55db/pone.0299639.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1f8d8c55efb3/pone.0299639.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/ba62da1e0a50/pone.0299639.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/c58cfa079619/pone.0299639.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/bb14976c29ce/pone.0299639.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/be54a84f733a/pone.0299639.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1cf3457d184c/pone.0299639.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/c361db9c46db/pone.0299639.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/261a226f235a/pone.0299639.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/a615f19ea7e0/pone.0299639.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1d037ec56632/pone.0299639.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/65bd666f927d/pone.0299639.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f17fcfbaca80/pone.0299639.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/aacbd4b99a01/pone.0299639.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/6b4a0803475d/pone.0299639.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/97579c80d82c/pone.0299639.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/cb4cceaf3a9a/pone.0299639.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f9dc6ea9bf27/pone.0299639.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/f79ecca97dda/pone.0299639.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/96bd849f55db/pone.0299639.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1f8d8c55efb3/pone.0299639.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/ba62da1e0a50/pone.0299639.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/c58cfa079619/pone.0299639.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/bb14976c29ce/pone.0299639.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/be54a84f733a/pone.0299639.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/1cf3457d184c/pone.0299639.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/c361db9c46db/pone.0299639.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/261a226f235a/pone.0299639.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7786/10901361/a615f19ea7e0/pone.0299639.g019.jpg

相似文献

1
Significant duration prediction of seismic ground motions using machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的地震地面运动显著持时预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0299639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299639. eCollection 2024.
2
Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.我们是否需要不同的机器学习算法来进行定量构效关系建模?对 16 种机器学习算法在 14 个定量构效关系数据集上的综合评估。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Jul 20;22(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa321.
3
Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.利用机器学习实现猪生产性状的遗传位点筛选和基因组预测。
FASEB J. 2023 Jun;37(6):e22961. doi: 10.1096/fj.202300245R.
4
Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor.以胎儿心率作为强预测指标,用于预测体外受精-胚胎移植后早期妊娠丢失的机器学习算法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105624. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105624. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Machine learning for evolutive lymphoma and residual masses recognition in whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images.机器学习在全身弥散加权磁共振图像中对淋巴瘤和残留肿块的识别。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;209:106320. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106320. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Error Tolerance of Machine Learning Algorithms across Contemporary Biological Targets.机器学习算法在当代生物靶标中的容错性。
Molecules. 2019 Jun 4;24(11):2115. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112115.
7
Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.使用机器学习对颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的结果预测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18332.
8
The box office prediction model based on the optimized XGBoost algorithm in the context of film marketing and distribution.基于优化 XGBoost 算法的电影营销和发行环境下的票房预测模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0309227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309227. eCollection 2024.
9
Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.机器学习能预测药物治疗效果吗?一项在骨质疏松症中的应用研究。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107028. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107028. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodule using gradient tree boosting and Bayesian optimization.基于梯度提升树和贝叶斯优化的肺结节计算机辅助诊断。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0195875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195875. eCollection 2018.